Page 24 - Investment Advisor May 2021
P. 24

RIA LESSONS & LEADERS

                By Peter Nesvold and James Cofer




                Buy, Sell or Grow? Company Structure

                Challenges and Solutions


                Tax and legal issues complicate the ability of S- and C-corporations to
                finance growth, succession and/or liquidity. Here are some options.



                      hances are you have been                                      buying back equity using company funds
                      approached multiple times                                     and retiring the shares. However, it is not
                Cabout selling or merging your                                      just the selling shareholder who faces
                investment advisory firm. These over-                               a capital gains tax bill; all S-corp share-
                tures often prompt stakeholders of many                             holders — regardless of whether the indi-
                successful wealth management firms to                               vidual sold any shares — are required to
                consider, what is our long-term strategic                           pay a portion of the capital gains tax.
                plan? Should we buy, sell or grow? If we
                remain independent, how do we trans-                                What to do?
                fer equity to next generation without                               So what’s an S-corp to do to finance
                triggering substantial tax liability?                               growth and/or succession? Here are
                  Planning for growth, succession or                                some solutions:
                liquidity involves a myriad of strategic                              • LLC drop-down.  For S-corpor-
                considerations. Unfortunately, a regis-  U.S. citizens, legal residents, estates or   ations that wish to bring institutional
                tered investment advisor organized as a   certain types of trusts. The restriction   capital  into  the  business,  or  for  those
                S- or C-corporation instead of a Limited   against LLCs or C-corps as sharehold-  that wish to create profits interests for
                Liability Company faces additional lay-  ers is a significant drawback because   employees, one alternative is a so-called
                ers of tax and legal complexity that   most institutional investors — including   LLC drop-down transaction: the S-corp
                narrows future strategic options unless   private equity — only can invest through   forms an LLC as a wholly-owned sub-
                proactively addressed.            one of these two business entities.  sidiary and transfers all of the firm’s
                                                    Limited options to create employ-  assets to the new LLC. The new inves-
                CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR      ee incentive plans. S-corps lack the   tors then invest in the LLC, rather than
                S-CORPS                           flexibility enjoyed by LLCs for creating   the S-corp.
                Prior to the rise in popularity of LLCs   innovative employee incentive plans.   The  biggest drawback to  the  LLC
                in the  late 1990s, S-corporations  were   For instance, an LLC can grant a profits   drop-down alternative is that the firm
                among the most popular business enti-  interest to an employee that entitles   must notify all clients of the change
                ties used for RIAs. Although S-corps   the employee to a specific percentage   in ownership structure. If the invest-
                carried some known restrictions, the   of the business’s profits. The distribu-  ment agreements contain an affirma-
                structure offered the limited liability   tions will be taxable to the employee,   tive consent provision, every client
                protection of a C-corp but with only one   but the mere act of granting the profits   would potentially need to sign off on
                level of taxation.                interest is not.                  the transfer.
                  In the years since, the advisory busi-  An S-corp may not offer a similar plan,   • S-corporation inversion. An
                ness has outgrown the S-corp structure   largely due to the prohibition against   S-corp inversion might be an attrac-
                because it constrains firms’ ability to   multiple classes of stock. Moreover, the   tive option if an LLC drop-down would
                grow and transfer equity to next gen   new shareholder would recognize tax-  trigger a disproportionate number of
                managers. Here are some examples:  able  income  at the grant  date  in the   assignment consents.
                  Limited ability to raise institution-  amount of the fair market value of the   In this alternative, the shareholders
                al capital. Most principals of RIAs orga-  new shares.              of  the  S-corp  (“Old  S”)  form  a  new
                nized as S-corps already are aware that   Tax complications upon partial   corporate holding company above Old
                the number of shareholders is limited   retirements of equity. Some RIAs cre-  S; this new holding company makes   Adobe Stock
                to 100 and that all shareholders must be   ate liquidity for a founding principal by   an  S-election  (“New  S”)  and the  Old  S



             22 INVESTMENT ADVISOR MAY 2021 | ThinkAdvisor.com
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29