DOL Fiduciary Rule Halted by Texas Court

News July 26, 2024 at 11:15 AM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • The FACC and several independent insurance agents requested to delay the implementation of Labor's fiduciary rule.
Image of a gavel on an open book and the words Fiduciary Rule, along with the logo of the US Dept. of Labor

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division has granted the request of the Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice and several independent insurance agents to delay the implementation of the Labor Department's new fiduciary rule.

FACC and the agents filed for a preliminary injunction in late May in the federal court, seeking to force Labor to delay implementation the rule.

The filing — the group's second — argues that Labor's rule will cause too much damage if it goes into effect, so the court needs to delay its implementation until FACC's existing case against Labor's Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 on rollover advice is resolved.

The decision, released Thursday, grants the plaintiffs' motion, staying the rule's Sept. 23 effective date and that of the amended PTE 84-24 until a further court order.

The 2024 fiduciary rule "suffers from many of the same problems" as the rule Labor enacted in 2016, the decision states. (That rule was ultimately vacated.)

"Plaintiffs are insurance agents who sell annuities and other products to clients rolling over their retirement investments from employer-provided plans (such as 401(k)s) into IRAs," the descision states. "They argue that the 2024 Rule conflicts with [the Employee Retirement Income Securiy Act] by imposing ERISA-fiduciary status on 'any insurance agent who merely complies with state insurance laws when dealing with an ERISA plan member or owner of an [IRA].'"

And "complying with the Rule while this lawsuit is pending, they argue, will subject them to 'significant compliance burdens, … potential liability under ERISA, and potential enforcement actions by DOL,'" the decision continues.

The plaintiffs, the ruling states, "are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim because the 2024 Fiduciary Rule conflicts with ERISA in several ways, including by treating as fiduciaries those who engage in onetime recommendations to roll over assets from an ERISA plan to an IRA."

DOL's related amendments to Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24 "are also unreasonable and arbitrary and capricious," the decision states.

The ruling "is very disappointing and I believe it was wrongly decided," Micah Hauptman, director of investor protection for the Consumer Federation of America, told ThinkAdvisor Friday in an email. "Retirement savers need the protections of the rule and they are going to continue to suffer harm because implementation of the rule is stayed."

FACC said Friday in a statement that "it is clear that Judge [Jeremy] Kernodle examined the issues carefully and found DOL's new fiduciary rule to be irreconcilable with the Fifth Circuit decision [vacating the 2016 fiduciary rule] and with ERISA. FACC stands ready to ensure the rule is ultimately vacated and upheld as necessary through any appeals."

'Long Litigation Journey'

The court's decision to stay the fiduciary rule and PTE 84-24 "is the beginning of a long litigation journey," ERISA attorney Fred Reish, partner at Faegre Drinker in Los Angeles, added in another email.

"In all likelihood, the DOL will appeal that decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. And all of this is before there is a decision on the merits. Regardless of the court's decision on the validity of the regulation and the exemption — which should come in the next few months, the losing party will appeal that to the Fifth Circuit."

Then, "regardless of the decision by a panel of the Fifth Circuit judges, a request will be made for an en banc hearing by all of the Fifth Circuit judges," Reish continued. "And then the losing party will likely ask the Supreme Court to hear the case. Of course, this is a 'best guess,' but I believe it is a probable scenario."

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center