DOL Fiduciary Shift Could Apply During Long Litigation Battle

News March 19, 2024 at 03:15 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Efforts to kill one previous DOL fiduciary rule effort took two years, and another took one year.
  • A Supreme Court ruling overturning the Chevron doctrine could help federal courts kill the effort.
  • Federal lower courts may take time to digest and apply whatever Chevron ruling the Supreme Court issues.
The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.

Annuity issuers, annuity producers and advisors have to prepare to comply with the U.S. Department of Labor's proposed investment advice fiduciary definition, even if the courts eventually kill it.

Emily Kile-Maxwell, an attorney at Faegre Drinker, gave that advice Tuesday during a webinar.

The federal courts took about two years to stop a 2016 Labor Department fiduciary rule effort and about a year to stop a 2020 effort, Kile-Maxwell said.

"Most likely, we're not going to be able to rely on litigation to vacate the rule before it goes into effect," she said.

What it means: Life insurers have to prepare to set up elaborate Labor Department fiduciary standard compliance systems that may be in use for just a few years.

The saga: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 gives the Labor Department authority to impose a fiduciary standard on benefit plan advisors, and the department is interpreting that to mean that it can regulate the advice given to users of retirement plans and individual retirement arrangements that qualify for federal retirement account tax incentives.

The department is now getting ready to release the final version of the final regulation and updates to two closely related supplements, Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2020-02 and PTE 84-24. The rules would affect companies and people that help retirement savers roll assets from retirement plans and IRAs into other arrangements.

The PTE 2020-02 update would affect how insurers apply the new fiduciary standard definition to themselves, their employees and agents who are treated as employees.

The PTE 84-24 update would affect how insurers handle relationships with outside producers who are selling their annuities and other products.

The department sent the final version to Office of Management and Budget regulation reviewers March 8, and Fred Reish, an ERISA attorney at Faegre Drinker, predicted the regulation could show up in public by May.

Chevron: Kile-Maxwell suggested that, depending on what the final regulation and PTE updates look like, suits against the new rules could start immediately and rely on strategies similar to those used to block the 2016 and 2020 Labor Department fiduciary standard efforts.

One new wrinkle that could slow resolution of litigation is the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear two suits challenging the court's "Chevron doctrine." The doctrine holds that the federal courts should give deference to reasonable federal agency interpretations of federal laws within the agencies' area of expertise.

The Supreme Court's decision could come out by late June. Court observers say the justices seem to be inclined to overturn or narrow the Chevron doctrine.

A ruling overturning or narrowing Chevron could help opponents of a new Labor Department fiduciary rule effort, by giving the federal courts more ability to disagree with the department's interpretation of ERISA, but some lower courts may be reluctant to rush to apply the Supreme Court's new ruling, Kile-Maxwell said.

The compliance packet: Faegre Drinker attorneys noted that the amount of documentation that insurers and producers will need to collect to comply with the updated PTE 84-24 requirements would be substantial.

In addition to a sheet describing a commission-based producer's compensation arrangements, the packet would have to include a discussion of why the producer is recommending a rollover, a discussion of why the producer is recommending the annuity or other product chosen, a comparison of the costs of the products that were considered, and a comparison of the standards of care that apply to the products considered.

The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington. Credit: Bloomberg

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center