March 13, 2024
7792 / Does the “at risk” limitation on losses apply to an investor in real estate? If so, what effect will it have?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
Generally, the “at risk” rules apply to losses incurred after 1986 with respect to real estate placed in service after 1986.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a> However, in the case of an interest in an S corporation, a partnership, or other pass-through entity acquired after 1986, the “at risk” rules will apply to losses incurred after 1986 no matter when the real estate was placed in service.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a><br />
<br />
In general, the “at risk” rules limit the deduction an investor may claim for the investor’s share of net losses generated by the real estate activity to the amount he or she has at risk in that activity. The rules do not prohibit an investor from offsetting the investor’s share of the deductions generated by the activity against the income received from the activity. For a detailed explanation of the operation of the “at risk” limitation, see Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="8006">8006</a> to Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="8009">8009</a>.<br />
<br />
Put as simply as possible, an investor is initially “at risk” to the extent that he or she is not protected against the loss of money or other property contributed to the program. One special exception applies in the real estate context, however. An investor is considered at risk with respect to certain qualified nonrecourse financing incurred in the holding of real property. For the specifics as to how an investor’s “amount at risk” is calculated, see Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="8005">8005</a>.<br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. IRC § 465(c); TRA ’86 § 503(c)(1).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. TRA ’86 § 503(c)(2).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7847 / Can gain on the sale of vacant land be excluded from income?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
The regulations permit the gain from sales or exchanges of vacant land to be excluded under IRC Section 121 if the following requirements are satisfied: (1) the vacant land must be adjacent to the land containing the taxpayer’s principal residence; (2) the taxpayer must have owned and used the vacant land as part of the taxpayer’s principal residence; (3) the land sale must occur within two years before or after the date of the sale of the residence; and (4) the statutory requirements must have otherwise been met with respect to the vacant land.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a><br />
<br />
The sales or exchanges of the residence and the vacant land are treated as one sale or exchange. Therefore, only one maximum limitation amount of $250,000 ($500,000 in the case of certain married taxpayers filing jointly) applies to the combined sales or exchanges of vacant land and the residence.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> For more information on the rules governing sales or exchanges of vacant land, see Treasury Regulations Sections 121-1(b)(3)(ii)(A) (how to apply the maximum limitation amount to sales or exchanges occurring in different taxable years); 1.121-1(b)(3)(ii)(B) (sale or exchange of more than one principal residence in a two-year period); 1.121-1(b)(3)(ii)(C) (sale or exchange of vacant land before residence).<br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. Treas. Reg. § 1.121-1(b)(3)(i).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. Treas. Reg. § 1.121-1(b)(3)(ii)(A).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7849 / Can gain from the sale of property that was used only partly as a principal residence be excluded from income?
<div class="Section1">IRC Section 121 does not apply to the gain allocable to any portion of property that is separate from the “dwelling unit” to which a taxpayer does not satisfy the use requirement. A taxpayer is <em>not</em> required to allocate gain if both the residential and business portions of the property are within the <em>same</em> dwelling unit. Although the taxpayer must pay tax on the gain equal to the total depreciation taken after May 6, 1997, he or she may exclude any additional gain on the residence up to the maximum amount. However, if the business portion of the property is <em>separate</em> from the dwelling unit, the taxpayer is required to allocate the gain, and is able to exclude only the portion of the gain attributable to the residential unit.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a> The term “dwelling unit” has the same meaning as in IRC Section 280A(f)(1), but does not include appurtenant structures or other property.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> The method for determining the amount of gain allocable to the residential and nonresidential portions of the property is explained in Treasury Regulation Section 1.121-1(e)(3).<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. Treas. Reg. § 1.121-1(e)(1).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. Treas. Reg. § 1.121-1(e)(2).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7833 / If real property subject to a nonrecourse mortgage is sold or abandoned, must the seller include the unpaid balance of the mortgage in a calculation of gain or loss?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
Yes. Gain from sale of property is defined as the excess of the amount realized over the seller’s tax basis (as adjusted for items such as depreciation). Loss is the excess of the tax basis (as adjusted) over the amount realized.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a> The tax basis of property includes any unpaid nonrecourse mortgage liability, and on sale of the property subject to the mortgage the amount realized by the owner includes the unpaid balance of any nonrecourse mortgage on the property.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> It does not make any difference that the unpaid balance of the mortgage exceeds the fair market value of the property at the time of sale.<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>3</sup></a><br />
<br />
Abandonment of property subject to a nonrecourse debt is treated as a sale or exchange and the amount of outstanding debt is an “amount realized” on sale or exchange for purposes of determining and characterizing gain or loss.<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>4</sup></a><br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. IRC § 1001.<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. <em>Crane v. Comm.</em>, 331 U.S. 1 (1947).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">3</a>. IRC § 7701(g); <em>Comm. v. Tufts</em>, 103 S. Ct. 1826, 83-1 USTC ¶ 9328 (1983).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">4</a>. <em>Yarbro v. Comm.</em>, 737 F.2d 479, 84 USTC ¶ 9691 (5th Cir. 1984); <em>Middleton v. Comm.</em>, 77 TC 310 (1981), <em>aff’d</em>, 693 F.2d 124, 82 USTC ¶ 9713 (11th Cir. 1982).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7835 / How is gain or loss on the sale of rental property to a related person treated?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
Gain on the sale of property depreciable by the purchaser is ordinary gain if the sale is between certain related parties. For this purpose, related parties are: (1) a person and a corporation or partnership of which the person owns (directly or indirectly) a 50 percent or more interest; (2) an individual and a trust in which the individual (or the individual’s spouse) is a beneficiary having more than a remote interest; (3) generally, an executor and a beneficiary of an estate; and (4) an employer and a welfare benefit fund.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a> In determining 50 percent ownership, the general rules of constructive ownership under IRC Section 267(c) apply (except paragraph (3) thereof).<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a><br />
<br />
If the sale is an installment sale, the installment method of reporting is denied and the proceeds are deemed to be received in the year of sale, unless the Service is satisfied that avoidance of federal income taxes was not one of the principal purposes of the disposition<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>3</sup></a> (see Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="667">667</a>).<br />
<br />
Gain or loss on transfers between spouses or former spouses incident to a divorce is not recognized, and the basis of the property generally remains the same in the hands of the transferee as in the hands of the transferor<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>4</sup></a> (see Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="789">789</a>).<br />
<br />
Loss on the sale of property to certain related persons is not recognized (see Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="701">701</a>).<br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. IRC §§ 1239(a), 1239(d).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. IRC § 1239(c)(2).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">3</a>. IRC § 453(g).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">4</a>. IRC § 1041.<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7789 / How does real estate shelter income through absolute savings?
<div class="Section1">Some types of real estate investment (e.g., low-income housing and rehabilitation of old or historic structures) provide tax credits that directly reduce the tax on an individual’s income. See Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="7801">7801</a> and Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="7808">7808</a>. Because investment in real estate will generally be a passive activity, such credits may normally offset only taxes from passive activities of the taxpayer, although passive losses and the deduction-equivalent of credits with respect to certain rental real estate activities may offset up to $25,000 of nonpassive income of an individual. (The passive loss rules are explained in Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="8010">8010</a> to Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="8021">8021</a>.) Investment tax credits can offer absolute shelter of income that would otherwise be spent for taxes, provided the property is held long enough. If not, there is some recapture. Even if this is the case, however, there has been the benefit of deferral.</div><br />
March 13, 2024
7852 / If the maximum exclusion for gain on the sale of a principal residence is reduced because of a change in the taxpayer’s place of employment, health, or unforeseen circumstances, how is the reduced maximum exclusion calculated?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
The reduced maximum exclusion is computed by multiplying the maximum dollar limitation of $250,000 ($500,000 for certain joint filers) by a fraction.<br />
<br />
The numerator of the fraction is the shortest of: (1) the period that the taxpayer owned the property during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange; (2) the period that the taxpayer used the property as a principal residence during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or exchange; or (3) the period between the date of a prior sale of property for which the taxpayer excluded gain under IRC Section 121 and the date of the current sale or exchange. The numerator of the fraction may be expressed in days or months.<br />
<br />
The denominator of the fraction is 730 days or 24 months (depending on the measure of time used in the numerator).<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a> Thus, for example, a single taxpayer who would otherwise be permitted to exclude $250,000 of gain, but who has owned and used the principal residence for only one year and is selling it due to a job transfer, the fraction would be ½ and the maximum excludable amount would be $125,000 [½ × $250,000].<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a><br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. Treas. Reg. § 1.121-3(g)(1); see also IRC § 121(c)(1).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. See, e.g., Treas. Reg. § 1.121-3(c), Ex. 1; General Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted in 1998 (the 1998 Blue Book), p. 166.<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7799 / What is the treatment of a dwelling unit that is rented for fewer than 15 days in a year?
<div class="Section1">If an individual rents a dwelling unit (as defined in Q <a href="javascript:void(0)" class="accordion-cross-reference" id="7798">7798</a>) for fewer than 15 days during the year, and the individual has used it as a residence during the taxable year, the income received from such a rental is excluded from gross income and no deductions for rental are allowed.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a><div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. IRC § 280A(g).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />
March 13, 2024
7801 / What is the low-income housing tax credit?
<div class="Section1"><br />
<br />
The low-income housing tax credit is an income tax credit based on a percentage of the qualified basis of certain low-income housing placed in service after 1986. Generally, the credit is determined in the year in which the property is placed in service and may be taken annually for 10 years. Subject to certain limitations, the adjusted basis qualifying for the credit consists of expenditures for certain new housing or substantially rehabilitated housing.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1"><sup>1</sup></a><br />
<br />
Taxpayers seeking the credit make application to the local housing agency in order to obtain a building identification number.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2"><sup>2</sup></a> All taxpayers, except those who finance the project through certain tax-exempt bonds described in IRC Section 42(h)(4), must receive an allocation of the credit for the building.<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3"><sup>3</sup></a> All taxpayers, however, must comply with IRS certification requirements in order to obtain the credit.<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4"><sup>4</sup></a> If, during the 15-year compliance period, there is a change in the portion of housing that is low-income housing or the property ceases to qualify as low-income housing, there is a recapture of all or part of the credit.<a href="#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5"><sup>5</sup></a><br />
<br />
<div class="refs"><br />
<br />
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%"><br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">1</a>. IRC § 42.<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">2</a>. Notice 88-91, 1988 CB 414.<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">3</a>. IRC § 42(h)(1).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">4</a>. IRC § 42(l).<br />
<br />
<a href="#_ftnref5" name="_ftn5">5</a>. IRC § 42(j).<br />
<br />
</div></div><br />