The Tax Reform Act of 1986 repealed the reserve method of accounting for most taxpayers.
1 As a result, all taxpayers, except for certain financial institutions, must use the specific charge-off method in accounting for bad debts. Financial institutions may still be permitted to use the reserve method in accounting for bad debts.
Under the specific charge-off method, the taxpayer deducts amounts that were charged off on
its books during the tax year in question. To “charge-off” an item, a taxpayer can use any method that shows the intent to remove the debt as an asset.
2 The taxpayer must be the creditor both at the time that the worthlessness was determined
and at the time the debt was charged-off
3 (to allow otherwise would permit the taxpayer to claim a deduction for a loss that he did not own).
A debt that is “significantly modified” is deemed charged off.
4 A
modification means any alteration of the legal rights or obligations of a lender or borrower, whether the alteration is evidenced by an express agreement (oral or written), conduct of the parties, or otherwise. A modification includes any total or partial deletion from, or addition to, such rights or obligations, but excludes an alteration that occurs by operation of the terms of a debt instrument (i.e., the annual resetting of an interest rate). As a general rule, a modification is a significant modification only if, based on all facts and circumstances, the legal rights or obligations that are altered and the degree to which they are altered are economically significant.
5 Treasury Regulation Section 1.1001-3(e)-(f) provides rules for determining when specific modifications are significant.
6 The taxpayer must file a statement of facts substantiating the deduction along with the tax return containing the claim for the bad debt deduction.
7 Financial institutions are also entitled to use the reserve method to account for losses resulting from bad debts. Instead of deducting specific bad debts from gross income, a financial institution can choose to deduct a reasonable amount as a reserve for bad debts. An account must be maintained for the bad debt reserves.
8 The reasonableness of the amount claimed is a question of fact. Factors that are often considered in making the reasonableness determination include the type of business involved and the amount of the bad debt.
9 What is reasonable in one business can vary from that which is reasonable for another business or in a different geographical area.
In using the reserve method, the taxpayer must file a statement of facts in support of the claim for the bad debt deduction. The statement must contain the following information:
(1) the amount of charge sales or other business transactions for the year and the percentage of the reserve from these sales;
(2) the total amount of the business’ notes and accounts receivable at both the beginning and at the end of the tax year;
(3) the amount of debts that has become wholly or partially worthless and the amounts charged against the reserve account; and
(4) how the additional amount to the reserve account was determined.10
Special rules apply to certain banks claiming bad debt deductions.
11 If a claim for a bad debt deduction is disallowed during one tax year, but subsequently the debt actually does become worthless, the taxpayer has seven years to file a claim for refund for the year that the debt actually became worthless.12 This extension applies both to losses claimed under the specific charge-off method and under the reserve method.13 This extended period does not apply to partially worthless debt (see Q 8758).14
1. P.L. 99-514, § 805(a).
2.
Rubinkam v Commissioner, 118 F.2d 148 (7th Cir. 1941).
3.
Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v United States, 288 F.2d 750 (4th Cir. 1961).
4. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.166-3(3) and 1.1001-3 (definition of significantly modified debt).
5. Treas. Reg. § 1.1001-3(e)(1).
6. Treas. Reg. § 1.1001-3(c).
7. Treas. Reg. § 1.166-1(b).
8. Treas. Reg. § 1.166-4.
9. Treas. Reg. § 1.166-4(b).
10. Treas. Reg. § 1.166-4(c).
11. Treas. Reg. § 1.166-4(d),
see Treas. Reg. §§ 1.585-1 through 1.585-3.
12. IRC § 6511(d)(1).
13. Smith Elec. Co. v. United States, 461 F.2d 790 (Ct. Cl. 1972).
14. Treas. Reg. § 301.6511(d)-1(c).