Yes. There are two factors that contribute to the imposition of AMT. There are “exclusion items” and “deferral items.” Examples of an exclusion item include miscellaneous itemized deductions and state or local taxes that are deductible for regular income tax purposes, but never for AMT purposes. For this reason, there is never a credit for an exclusion item.
For AMT purposes, a deferral item is simply a matter of a timing difference. For example, certain property depreciated using the accelerated depreciation method must be depreciated under the straight line method for AMT purposes. Thus, for regular income tax purposes, depreciation amounts in the early years of property depreciated under the accelerated method will be higher than under the straight line method. For that reason, it will cause AMTI to be higher than regular taxable income. However, in later years, depreciation amounts for property depreciated under the accelerated method will be lower than depreciation amounts calculated using straight line depreciation.
Therefore, in the absence of an AMT credit for a deferral item, the taxpayer would be subject to double negative tax consequences with respect to one item.
Example: In 2024, Asher is subject to AMT. Although for regular income tax purposes, based on the accelerated depreciation method, Asher is entitled to a $2,500 depreciation deduction, for AMT purposes the straight line depreciation deduction is $1,750. As a result, Asher’s depreciation deduction is the lesser $1,750 amount.In 2025, Asher is not subject to AMT. However, based on the accelerated depreciation method, his regular income tax depreciation deduction is $1,500 (it would have been $1,750 if depreciated under the straight line method).
So, in the AMT year, Asher was not allowed to take the higher accelerated depreciation deduction. Later, in the non-AMT year, Asher was compelled to take the lower accelerated depreciation deduction.