The partnership agreement can dictate the allocation of separately stated items of partnership income, gain, loss, deductions, credits, and other bottom line income and loss, even if the allocation is disproportionate to the capital contributions of the partners (a so-called “special allocation”). However, if the method of allocation lacks “substantial economic effect” (or if no allocation is specified in the partnership agreement), the distributive shares will be determined in accordance with the partner’s interest in the partnership, based on all the facts and circumstances.
1 See Q
7767 regarding the partnership anti-abuse rule.
The purpose of the substantial economic effect test is to “prevent use of special allocations for tax avoidance purposes, while allowing their use for bona fide business purposes.”
2 Regulations provide that generally an allocation will not have economic effect unless the partners’ capital accounts are maintained properly, liquidation proceeds are required to be distributed in accordance with the partners’ capital account balances and, following distribution of such proceeds, partners are required to restore any deficits in their capital accounts to the partnership. The economic effect will generally not be considered substantial unless the allocation has a reasonable possibility of affecting substantially the dollar amounts received by partners, independent of tax consequences. Allocations are insubstantial if they merely shift tax consequences within a partnership tax year or are likely to be offset by other allocations in subsequent tax years.
3
1. IRC §§ 704(a), 704(b).
2. Sen. Fin. Comm. Report No. 938, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 100 (1976).
3. Treas. Reg. § 1.704-1(b)(2).