Indexing provides the benefit of preventing tax rate increases that result purely from inflation, as taxpayers’ escalating income levels push them into higher tax brackets. It also ensures that the income levels at which certain tax benefits are eliminated remain at inflation-adjusted levels so that the provisions continue to benefit those taxpayers for whom they were intended.
Prior to 2018, the indexing factor (referred to in the IRC as the cost-of-living adjustment) was the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the prior calendar year exceeded the CPI for a year designated as a reference point in each respective IRC Section. In all cases, the CPI is the average Consumer Price Index as of the close of the 12-month period ending on August 31 of the calendar year.4
The 2017 Tax Act provides that items that are adjusted annually for inflation will now be adjusted based on the Chained Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (C-CPI-U), as published by the Department of Labor, for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 (this change is therefore permanent).5 Essentially, the C-CPI-U is designed to take into account the fact that individuals change their purchasing habits as the cost of certain goods increases or decreases (in order to substitute lower priced goods for higher priced goods). C-CPI-U is designed to take into account purchasing patterns both before and after a price change.
Planning Point: This modification to the inflation indexing method was expected to push more taxpayers into higher tax brackets more quickly than under prior law. This is both because of the fact that C-CPI-U indexing makes it appear that inflation is growing faster than under CPI indexing, and because many employment-related increases in income are based on the CPI.
Regardless of the index that is used, in calculating the new tax rate schedules, the minimum and maximum dollar amounts for each rate bracket (except as described below) are increased by the applicable cost-of-living adjustment. The rates (percentages) themselves are not adjusted. This method of increase explained above, however, does not apply to the phaseout of the marriage penalty (see Q 753).6