On January 16, 2009, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) issued Chief Counsel Advice4 concluding that a taxpayer may not take a deduction under Section 162 for compensation paid to an employee pursuant to an employment contract, because the taxpayer was receiving disability insurance payments on account of the employee’s injury and Section 162 disallows a deduction for an expense for which there is a right or expectation of reimbursement.
However, upon further consideration, the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) concluded, based upon the facts in the prior CCA, that a taxpayer is not precluded from taking a Section 162 deduction for compensation paid to an employee pursuant to the employment contract merely because the taxpayer received insurance payments on account of an employee’s disability. Nor does Section 265(a)(1) disallow such a deduction.5
1. Rev. Rul. 66-262, 1966-2 CB 105.
2. Castner Garage, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 43 BTA 1 (1940).