The IRS has ruled that the payment of administrative or trustee fees incurred in connection with an individual retirement account may be claimed as a miscellaneous itemized deduction (i.e., for the production or collection of income) if such fees are separately billed and paid.
1 However, the 2017 tax reform legislation suspended all miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2 percent floor for 2018-2025. Furthermore, if separately billed and paid, the payment of such fees does not constitute a contribution to the individual retirement account and thus will not be an excess contribution or reduce the amount that may be contributed to the account or, in the case of a traditional IRA, deducted ( Q
3656).
2 Deduction of administrative fees is subject to the 2 percent floor on miscellaneous itemized deductions (prior to 2018).
Sales commissions on individual retirement annuities that are billed directly by an insurance agent to the client and paid separately by the client are not separately deductible, but are subject to the overall limits on contributions and deductions.
3 Similarly, broker’s commissions incurred in connection with the purchase of securities on behalf of an IRA are not separately deductible, but are subject to the overall limits.
4 An annual maintenance fee charged for self-directed brokerage accounts that did not vary with the number of transactions, the number of securities involved, or the dollar amount and that was paid to the trustee, not the broker, was not treated as a commission but was separately deductible as an administrative fee.
5 In addition, brokerage account “wrap fees” that were based on a percentage of assets under management, but that did not vary based on the number of trades in the account, were not treated as a commission and were separately deductible as an administrative fee.
6 The IRS has held that the payment of fees associated with flexible premium variable annuity contracts that are paid directly from subaccounts within the contract would not be considered a distribution from the contract.
The IRS ruled that assessing expenses against the contract is unrelated to whether or not the participant is currently entitled to benefits under the contract. Therefore, such payments are an expense of the contract and not a distribution.
7
1. Rev. Rul. 84-146, 1984-2 CB 61; Let. Ruls. 9005010, 8951010.
2. Let. Ruls. 8432109, 8329058, 8329055, 8329049.
3. Let. Rul. 8747072.
4. Rev. Rul. 86-142, 1986-2 CB 60; Let. Rul. 8711095.
5. Let. Rul. 8835062.
6. Let. Rul. 200507021.
7. Let. Rul. 9845003.