Questions as to whether death payments constitute compensation for an employee’s services and, if so, whether the compensation is reasonable typically arise only in connection with payments for stockholder-employees of a close corporation. In several cases it has been held that the payments, even though made under contract, were not compensation but were payments under a plan to provide financial security for the families of the stockholder-employees. Hence, the deductions were disallowed.3 On the other hand, payments were held reasonable and for a substantial business purpose in M. Buten and Sons, Inc. v. Comm.4
An employer who prefunds welfare benefit fund benefits will be subject to limits discussed in Q 4097 and Q 4101. If the funded benefit is considered deferred compensation, the deduction is subject to the rules in Q 3532 or Q 3573.
1. Southern Fruit Distributors v. U.S., 32 AFTR 2d 5598 (M.D. Fla. 1973).
2. IRC § 404(a)(5); Rev. Rul. 55-212, 1955-1 CB 299.