A sale to the insured is an exception to the transfer for value rule ( Q 279).1 The IRS has ruled privately that a transfer between two trusts, one of which benefitted the taxpayer directly (Trust A) and the second of which was a grantor trust established by the taxpayer (as grantor) for the benefit of his children and grandchildren (Trust B), would not violate the transfer for value rule because the transaction fell within the exception permitting sale of a policy to the insured himself.2
While both trusts were irrevocable, the taxpayer retained the power to reacquire assets he had placed within Trust B by substituting assets of equal value. The independent trustee responsible for overseeing Trust B was required to ensure that any substituted assets were of equal value to the assets the taxpayer chose to reacquire.
Trust A owned a life insurance policy on the taxpayer’s life, which the taxpayer wished to transfer into Trust B using his power of substitution. Because the taxpayer was both grantor of Trust B and the insured individual under the policy, the transaction was considered a transfer of the policy to the insured himself (the grantor and the grantor trust are treated as a single entity for tax purposes).