Jeremy Siegel: What Election Results Could Mean for Stocks, Bonds

News November 04, 2024 at 11:27 AM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • In short, a Republican sweep would be bad for bonds and good for stocks, while a Democratic sweep would be the reverse, he says.
  • At issue are the Trump tax cuts, which would cost $4.6 trillion to extend for another decade.
  • Divided government is a more likely scenario, Siegel says.
Professor Jeremy Siegel, Senior Economist to WisdomTree and Emeritus Professor of Finance at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Jeremy Siegel, WisdomTree senior economist and Wharton School professor emeritus, offered his views Friday on different potential U.S. election results and their likely effects on the financial markets.

Siegel, speaking on a WisdomTree webcast, noted that the public may not know the results Tuesday after the polls close, although he said markets may react anyway.

The economist also said he did not consider the S&P 500 an expensive market outside the Magnificent 7 tech mega-cap stocks, with a price-to-earnings ratio around 18, "which is very reasonable in today's world." And, he said, "the Mag Seven are an amazing group that keep on growing."

Siegel made predictions of what may happen if the election yields a split government between the presidency and both or either congressional houses, a Republican sweep of the White House and Congress or a Democratic sweep.

At issue, primarily, is the looming negotiation over the sweeping GOP tax overhaul of 2017, most of which is set to expire on Dec. 31, 2025, resetting tax rates to their previous levels and halving the estate and gift tax exemption. Republicans want to extend the cuts — which could cost $4.6 trillion over a decade — while Democrats want to let most of them expire.

Betting markets aren't counting on either a Democratic or Republican sweep of the presidency and Congress, Siegel noted.

Boiling down the likely market reaction to either scenario, though, Siegel predicted that a Republican sweep would be bad for bonds and good for stocks, while a Democratic sweep "would be better for the bond market, but worse for the stock market." 

A split government would be better for bonds and could be promising for stocks, he suggested.

If the election gives Republicans control of the White House and Congress, "I would not be surprised if we saw bonds spike 20 basis points," Siegel predicted, citing "fear that every tax cut that Trump wants can be enacted."

Siegel doesn't think Republicans would enact all those tax cuts, but he said movement in the bond market is like a shot across the bow, "saying 'Hey guys, don't act irresponsibly, you have to finance … $1.8 trillion worth of debt. And if you think you can raise that to $4 or $5 trillion a year, you're fooling yourself.'"

That's how the bond market warns politicians, he added.

The stock market is a different matter.

"If there's a Republican sweep, the stock market will love the fact that the Trump tax cuts can be extended. The capital gains (tax cuts) could be extended, not going to be a billionaire-millionaire tax, capital gains look good, less regulation. They love that," Siegel said, adding that stocks could go up in a Republican sweep.

"In other words, the strength of the corporate tax rate remaining low and perhaps going lower. I don't think that's going to happen because taxes have to be renegotiated at the end of 2025, but nonetheless, I would say a Republican sweep — bad for bonds, good for stocks," he said.

A Democratic sweep "would be better for the bond market, but worse for the stock market," he said.

A split, with Republicans controlling the Senate and the presidency but losing the House to the Democrats, is considered a likely scenario, and that might bode well for stocks, he suggested.

"That will be much better for the bond market because then obviously Trump's tax cuts cannot all go through and there'll be a check and balance, and there'll be, well, you could call it gridlock, but … there'll be negotiation," he explained. "The deficit cannot get out of control instantly with one party controlling.

"It wouldn't be as good for the stock market because tax legislation originates in the House of Representatives. If that goes Democratic, then it's going to be a big negotiation. Certainly the Trump tax cuts, some will expire, some will not." 

Siegel did say, however, that a split government with Democrats controlling the House could be OK for stocks, "just because there's a lot of uncertainty out there" about various events, including Federal Reserve actions and potential political unrest. He cited the VIX volatility index, which reflects uncertainty and hedging in the markets now.

"A lot of people say, 'I'm not going to invest until those events clear up,'" which Siegel called "a dumb investment strategy because when everything clears up, you're buying at the high. But nonetheless, that is the attitude of investors. … Say we get a result, no violence, everything is OK.. I expect the market to move up at that particular juncture," Siegel said.

"I don't like the bond market anyways. I don't like the trends in the bond market. The trends in the stock market are still strong."

Credit: WisdomTree

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center