Second Court Halts New Fiduciary Rule, as DOL Hits Back

News July 29, 2024 at 12:54 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • A second court in Texas has issued a decision to halt the rule's Sept. 23 implementation date.
  • The decision also blocks the amended prohibited transaction exemption (PTE) 84-24 on annuities.
  • The Labor Department could move to appeal one or both of the stays, says an attorney.
Photo illustration of Labor Department with President Joe Biden and Acting Labor Secretary Julie Su

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has issued the second decision to halt the Sept. 23 implementation date for the Labor Department's new fiduciary rule.

A Labor spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor on Monday, however, that despite two court actions the fiduciary rule is "essential to ensuring that retirement investors are protected."

On Thursday, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division granted the request of the Federation of Americans for Consumer Choice and several independent insurance agents to delay the implementation of Labor's new fiduciary rule and that of the amended prohibited transaction exemption (PTE) 84-24 on annuities until a further court order.

Late Friday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued its own stay of the fiduciary rule — known as the "Retirement Security Rule" — and the prohibited transaction exemptions 2020-02 on rollovers and 84-24 on annuities, as requested by nine insurance trade groups in American Council of Life Insurers, et. al. v. U.S. Department of Labor, et. al., filed on May 21.

The Friday decision in the suit brought by the trade groups "is broader than the FACC case as it applies to the entire DOL rule plus the associated PTE rules," 84-24 as well as PTE 2020-02, a spokesperson for the Insured Retirement Institute told ThinkAdvisor in an email Monday.

"The court orders for [the nine insurance groups'] case and FACC are only to halt implementation of the rule while the courts decide on the merits of each case," the spokesperson said.

The Friday order — which came down close to midnight — means that the regulations "will not take effect until the court rules on the merits of the case" brought by nine trade associations, the IRI spokesperson said.

The stay of the effective date "provides consumers with a needed reprieve from these devastating consequences as the court considers the substantial legal issues we have raised regarding this ill-advised rule," the insurance groups said Monday in a statement.

The nine trade groups, which filed their suit against the new fiduciary rule May 24, include IRI, the American Council of Life Insurers, and the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors.

"When investors get advice from a trusted financial professional about their retirement savings, they expect that advice to be in the customer's best interest, not the financial professional's," the Labor spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor Monday morning. "This rule makes that a reality."

Appeal Ahead?

Labor "may choose to appeal the stay in either or both actions," Steven Rabitz, partner and co-chair of employee benefits and executive compensation practice at law firm Dechert, told ThinkAdvisor in an email Monday.

"As the cases continue to proceed on the merits, any such challenge would likely cause additional uncertainty for financial institutions," Rabitz said.

"While we can make no predictions about any outcomes, it is fair to say that each of the judges in the two actions signaled deep skepticism as to the DOL's approach, with one even … suggesting that it was 'virtually certain' that the ruling would be on the merits," he stated.

SIFMA, FSI Weigh In

On June 29 via a plaintiff-intervenors' complaint , the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Financial Services Institute joined the suit filed in May by the nine insurance industry trade groups against Labor's fiduciary rule. FSI and SIFMA asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas court to vacate the rule.

Friday's decision "rightly prevents the Department of Labor's rule from taking effect as the court continues to weigh the merits of the case," SIFMA and FSI said Monday in a joint statement.

"The finalized rule unlawfully expands the definition of a 'fiduciary' and jeopardizes investors' access to advice and education," the two organizations said.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center