Industry trade groups are pressing the Labor Department to continue to receive public input on its fiduciary rule and not "finalize the rule now."
In a letter sent Monday to acting Labor Secretary Julie Su as well as the Office of Management and Budget, the 11 groups — which include the Financial Services Institute, the Insured Retirement Institute, the American Council of Life Insurers, Finseca and the National Association of Insurance Financial Advisors — state that Labor rushed its rule through and asked Labor and OMB to "stand up for the integrity of the regulatory process and continue the public input process."
The groups' letter comes just days after the White House Office of Management and Budget concluded on April 10 its review of Labor's final fiduciary rule.
Industry officials anticipate Labor could release its final rule by Wednesday.
The trade groups' letter cites concerns around "significant rulemaking flaws in the regulatory process at your two agencies" associated with Labor's recently proposed "Retirement Security Rule: Definition of an Investment Advice Fiduciary."
"The ramifications of this proposed rulemaking are extensive, making the need for public comment and careful review critical," the groups state. "In the view of many experts, DOL's 2016 rule had devastating effects on low- and middle-income individuals. We anticipate similar impacts should the proposal go final with little change."
Jason Berkowitz, IRI's chief legal and regulatory affairs officer, told ThinkAdvisor Monday in an email that Labor's "response to industry comments, testimony, and feedback to date has not been encouraging. However, we will seize upon every opportunity to remind DOL about the likely harm its proposed rule will inflict upon millions of retirement savers and the significant rulemaking flaws in this regulatory process."
The groups state in their letter that "it is paramount that the rulemaking process include careful scrutiny and a robust public policy dialogue," and that they "have grave concerns regarding DOL and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs' … extremely short review of a major rule that displayed little interest in public input and collaborative discourse."
The groups pressed Labor and OMB "to reconsider this rush to judgment and allow for further input and constructive dialogue before this rule is finalized. The consequences of this rule are too significant to be overlooked."