The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association urged the Labor Department on Tuesday to withdraw its new fiduciary rule proposal and warned that it "will not will not survive judicial scrutiny."
"Virtually the entire proposal is inconsistent" with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's decision, which overturned Labor's 2016 fiduciary rule, "including the various new exemption changes, which are overly prescriptive and unnecessary," SIFMA wrote in its comment letter.
SIFMA urged Labor "to abandon" its latest attempt to amend its definition of fiduciary regulation defining investment advice fiduciary, as well as the accompanying prohibited transaction exemption amendments.
Many of the changes proposed in the 2023 rule "are more troublesome" than those proposed in the 2010 and 2016 fiduciary rules, SIFMA said.
"They will not withstand judicial scrutiny," SIFMA stated. "We believe the proposed amendments will hurt investors, limit the offerings in fiduciary accounts, and require retirement investors to open self-directed brokerage accounts in addition to their advisory account, solely to access the range of investments that they have today."
Wall Street's trade group also complained that Labor's "inadequate comment period, truncated and interrupted by a hearing and multiple holidays (both federal and state, as well as days of religious observances), adversely and unfairly affects this rulemaking."
The comment period on Labor's proposal ends Tuesday.
The department has denied two requests to extend the Jan. 2 deadline for comments on its new fiduciary rule proposal.
The plan "includes an overly broad new definition of fiduciary, with overly narrow exemptive relief," SIFMA said, adding that "It is clear from this proposal that the Department intends to turn many ordinary communications between individuals into ERISA fiduciary conversations."