The House Appropriations Committee is still trying to persuade the Securities and Exchange Commission to make things easier for issuers of registered index-linked annuities.
The committee has added a provision asking the SEC to create a filing form just for RILA issuers in a comment on its SEC funding recommendations for federal fiscal 2023.
"The committee is concerned that the current registration process for registered index linked annuities (RILAs) is cumbersome and requires significant information not needed for other registered insurance products," the committee says in the comment, which appears on page 104 in a committee report on part of H.R. 8294, the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2023 package. "The committee encourages the SEC to create a tailored filing form for RILAs."
What It Means
House members are still trying to help RILA issuers — and they are still calling the products RILAs.
Players in the RILA market have called the products buffer annuities, structured annuities and variable indexed annuities.
A committee at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners has been calling the products index-linked variable annuities.
The House Appropriations Committee's loyalty to the term "RILA" may increase the odds that most people will eventually call the products RILAs.
What Is a RILA?
The SEC classifies a RILA as a variable annuity, meaning that a RILA can expose the holder to the risk of investment-related loss of account value.
Insurers have relied mainly on investment funds that resemble mutual funds to power traditional variable annuities' investment menus.
For RILA issuers, the main tools for powering the investment options menu are derivatives contracts tied to the performance of investment indexes.
The Filing Issue
Today, RILA issuers must register their products using the same kinds of S-1 and S-3 forms that companies use to take companies such as Apple and Amazon public.
The Insured Retirement Institute and other life and annuity industry groups have argued that requiring a life insurer to file an S-1 for every RILA product it offers is overkill.
