Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, is a big proponent of a Medicare-for-All healthcare system.
Government-controlled health care has been on the minds of benefits advisors for years now, looming as a distant threat, but often pushed aside for more pressing concerns. But during the opening keynote of the NextGen Growth & Leadership Summit in Nashville in early February, Nelson Griswold warned that the benefits industry underestimates the threat of single-payer at its own peril.
Citing a progression from Hillary Clinton to Bernie Sanders, and a lack of clarity from President Trump, Griswold, a benefits industry thought leader and strategist, discussed the growing momentum around the idea of Medicare for All, adding that although government-controlled health care doesn't generally poll well, everything changes when you ask Americans if they're interested in Medicare for All.
For example, recent surveys have found that 70 percent of Americans are open to adopting Medicare for All, while even 52 percent of Republicans support it.
Griswold noted that former Aetna CEO, Mark Bertolini, also weighed in recently, saying "As a nation, I think we should have a debate about single-payer."
"As I was growing up," Griswold said, "the bulwark against the idea of socialized medicine was always the doctors. So most concerning of all to me is the fact that 56 percent of doctors now either strongly support or somewhat support single payer health care."
So what does that mean for benefits advisors? Yes, a growing number of advisors have made a conscious decision to become consultants rather than insurance brokers, which would give them an advantage if a major shift should occur. "But this is a fight we don't want to lose," Griswold warned. "Once a country has moved to government-controlled health care, it has never gone back. My prediction is that we'll have single payer in five years."
As attendees let those words sink in, Griswold examined the factors contributing to this potential sea change.
"What's driving people's frustration and willingness to embrace a new system?" he asked. "The numbers, of course."
American health care has increased in cost every year since 1960, Griswold said. "In the last 17 years alone, we've seen 261 percent growth in the cost of health care. Why does it go up every year? We're in a period of almost no inflation elsewhere, and yet we've had massive inflation in health care year over year."
Griswold pointed to the root cause of the problems with American health care identified by John Torinus in his book, "The Company That Solved Health Care." Torinus wrote, "CEOs should be embarrassed at how they have allowed health costs to run wild. They would not allow that to happen in any other part of their businesses."
Companies manage and negotiate other aspects of their business down to the penny or even a tenth of a penny, Griswold said. "Why wouldn't they do the same with the cost of a heart transplant?"
Some executives are starting to get it, but it's been a very slow awakening. "Why is the C-suite ignoring their second or third largest cost set?" he asked. "Why do these otherwise brilliant and business-savvy people refuse to look at health care?"
"I believe it's due to something I call health care's big lie. This lie has been told over and over to CEOs and CFOs until they believe it."
What's the big lie? "Mr. and Mrs. CEO/CFO, you have no control over the cost of your health care. There's nothing you can do to influence it and it will increase every year. So will your health care premiums. You must learn to live with it. We'll do our best to manage it, but there's nothing we can really do either."
Griswold said this idea creates a wall that separate two groups that should be talking: the payer (employers or individual patients who are paying) and the providers (doctors, hospitals and drug companies). The wall means there's no communication, other than providers throwing claims statements over the wall and the payers throwing cash back the other way, Griswold said.
