The substitution of one insured for another under an exchange-of-insureds option on a corporate-owned key person policy is treated by the IRS as a sale or other disposition under IRC Section 1001 and not as a tax-free exchange under IRC Section 1035(a).
1 The IRS determined that an insurance company’s exchange of old corporate-owned life insurance contracts (modified endowment contracts (MECs) issued after June 8, 1997) for new corporate-owned contracts qualified as a tax-free exchange under IRC Section 1035 when each new contract would insure the life of the same individual who was insured under the old contract.
2 The IRS also has ruled that if a taxpayer (employer) that owns MECs issued by the same insurance company in the same calendar year exchanges some of those MECs for new MECs issued by a second insurance company, the new contracts are
not required to be aggregated with the remaining original contracts under IRC Section 72(e)(12).
3The IRS has ruled that if a taxpayer receives a check from a life insurance company under a nonqualified annuity contract, the endorsement of the check to a second company, as consideration for a second annuity contract, does
not qualify as a tax-free exchange under IRC Section 1035(a)(3).
Instead, the amount received by the taxpayer is taxed on an income-first basis under IRC Section 72(e).
4See Q
19 for a discussion of the effect of an IRC Section 1035 exchange on the grandfathered status of a policy issued prior to June 21, 1988, and thus not subject to the seven pay test of IRC Section 7702A.
1. Rev. Rul. 90-109, 1990-2 CB 191.
2. Let. Rul. 200711014.
See also Let. Rul. 200801001.
3. Rev. Rul. 2007-38, 2007-25 IRB 1420.
4. Rev. Rul. 2007-24, 2007-21 IRB 1282.