H.R. 4061 would require FSOC to use a more open process when deciding whether life insurers and other non-bank organizations are "systemically important financial institutions," or SIFIs.
Back in 2008, when the Great Recession began, federal regulators already had the authority to take over struggling banks.
Congress put the SIFI program in the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 because members wanted to give federal financial services regulators a way to step in when it looked as if the meltdown of some other type of company could, possibly knock down the entire U.S. financial system.
Executives at American International Group Inc., brought a festering financial crisis out in the open in September 2008, when they warned federal regulators that they faced an enormous, escalating need for cash to serve as collateral for the company's credit defaults swaps operation.
The credit default swaps unit provided a kind of financial insurance against the risk that mortgage-backed securities would go bad. AIG ran into trouble when waves of borrower defaults hit mortgage-backed securities that once looked like excellent risks.
Supporters of the current SIFI designation system say federal regulators need tools for addressing massive problems at companies other than banks, and that the tools need to be flexible and opaque enough to keep the non-bank SIFIs' managers from evading necessary federal oversight.
Life insurers have argued that AIG's credit default swaps business had nothing to do with ordinary life insurance operations, that ordinary life insurance operations pose no threat to the stability of the U.S. financial system, and that the SIFI designation process has created costly, nerve-wracking headaches for life insurers.
MetLife Inc., for example, went to court to free itself from SIFI status and won. In April 2016, a federal judge ruled that the process FSOC used to designate MetLife as a SIFI was arbitrary and capricious.
(Image: U.S. House) 
