Delay Social Security, Invest More or Buy an Annuity: What’s Best for Retirement Income?

Analysis January 03, 2025 at 06:22 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • A recent analysis shows it’s possible to outperform delayed Social Security claiming — but doing so requires significant risk.
  • For the typical married couple with average or better longevity, waiting to claim is generally better.
  • Delayed claiming will also often beat using annuities, but income guarantees have other virtues.
/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2023/07/02_Blanchett_David_NEW_640x640.jpg

Clients who want to claim Social Security early and reinvest the proceeds need a strong stomach for taking portfolio risk in order to come out ahead, according to a recent report published by PGIM’s David Blanchett.

Beating the delayed claiming strategy requires an 8% annual return for an individual retiree, according to Blanchett, and achieving comparable returns has historically required that 75% or more of a portfolio be allocated to equities.

The risk tolerance for a married couple has to be even higher, Blanchett’s analysis finds. That’s because a couple with one or both members likely to live to 90 or beyond will need to achieve yearly returns around 10% to “outperform” delayed Social Security claiming when spousal and survivor benefits are taken into account.

Blanchett’s research also shows that delayed claiming often beats buying a lifetime income annuity, though advisors and clients should closely review the tradeoffs that come with different income strategies. For some clients, a lower amount of guaranteed income could make more sense than the possibility of earning excess returns by taking more risk.

“To be clear, I’m not suggesting people shouldn’t buy lifetime income annuities, rather that the potential benefits of delayed claiming are typically going to be higher,” Blanchett wrote last week on LinkedIn.

“The breakeven return is usually [higher for the most common] longevity planning ages, and therefore delayed claiming needs to jointly be considered during the lifetime income purchasing process,” he said

Overall, Blanchett argues, delayed claiming of Social Security retirement benefits can be an especially attractive way to generate retirement income for those focused on longevity risk.

The Simplest Breakeven Scenario

Blanchett’s first set of scenarios ignores any kind of spousal survivor benefit, but he reviews five different delayed claiming scenarios: claiming at age 62 versus 65, 62 versus 67, 62 versus 70, 65 versus 67 and 65 versus 70.

The scenarios also consider the possibility of the retiree buying a life-only single premium immediate annuity (SPIA) at age 65 and with an anticipated yearly payout of 7.5%. (This figure is based on estimated payouts from annuity research firm CANNEX generated on Aug. 6.)

Blanchett shows that — as expected — the necessary breakeven returns for the early claiming strategy generally increase for those with longer expected lifespans, since such retirees would receive higher delayed benefits for a longer period of time.

“At age 85 the breakeven return averages about 7%,” Blanchett observes. “Note, age 85 is a relatively aggressive longevity planning age (e.g., in a financial plan), where ages 90 or 95 are more common.”

By age 90, the necessary breakeven yearly returns all exceed 8%, and by age 95 they are all about 9%. In the annuity scenario, the necessary breakeven returns are lower, landing at about 6% with assumed longevity of 90.

While U.S. stocks have had a long-term return that exceeded 8%, actually getting that full return would require a relatively risky portfolio with a significant level of uncertainty compared to Social Security benefits or payouts from guaranteed income annuities. Forecasted stock returns for the next decade are also lower than historical averages, Blanchett warns.

What About Married Couples?

Blanchett also runs the numbers for a married couple, finding even more of an incentive to delay claiming.

“The total benefits received decline upon the death of the first spouse, since the household would be going from two beneficiaries to one — but delayed claiming has the potential to significantly increase the level of income the surviving spouse could receive,” Blanchett observes. “This could change the decision about whether to delay.”

In the end, the largest benefits associated with delayed claiming occur when both the primary earner and their spouse have higher-than-average life expectancies — which is also consistent with expectations.

The Bottom Line

Ultimately, Blanchett writes, the decision about when to start claiming Social Security retirement benefits can have significant implications for retirement outcomes.

For most retirees who have enough assets to give them flexibility when choosing the age at which they claim benefits — and the expected longevity to consider doing so — the required breakeven return is likely to top 8% for individuals and 10% for married couples.

“The breakeven return for purchasing a life only annuity is lower than delayed claiming, typically in the neighborhood of 6% for more common longevity planning ages (e.g., age 90 or over),” Blanchett adds. “This suggests that while purchasing a life annuity can add value, delayed claiming of Social Security should likely be considered first, given the higher breakeven return.”

Pictured: David Blanchett

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center