The Myth of Cash on the Sidelines

Commentary January 02, 2025 at 05:54 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Speculation abounds that much of the nearly $7 trillion currently held in money market accounts will flow into stocks as interest rates fall.
  • But investors will probably just park much of that cash in long-term bonds — or keep it in the bank.
  • Investment strategies should be based on fundamentals, like earnings projections.
/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2024/08/02_Money_Cash_Roll_Adobe_640x640.jpg

Throughout this bull market, the phrase “cash on the sidelines” has been frequently used to indicate money sitting in liquid accounts, supposedly waiting to get in the metaphorical game — the stock market.

Rapidly declining inflation in 2024 has spurred speculation that much of the nearly $7 trillion currently held in money market accounts will naturally flow into stocks as the interest rates these accounts pay head downward amid the Federal Reserve's cuts to the target federal funds rate.

However, there’s always a lot of cash in the U.S. economy in different forms. Most of it probably isn’t waiting to see market action. It’s never been in the game and probably never will be.

On Dec. 18, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell threw a little cold water on expectations of many rate cuts in 2025, despite announcing a 25 basis-point cut.

Yet, even if the Fed ends up cutting rates as much and as fast as projected several months ago, there are some good reasons to doubt the widespread assumption that a large chunk of money market cash would flow into stocks in 2025 — or ever, for that matter.

Godot Won’t Show

If Irish playwright Samuel Beckett were alive today and understood these reasons, he’d probably say investors expecting such inflows were waiting for Godot. Similarly, William Shakespeare would probably dismiss this fixation as much ado about nothing, and investment strategies based on it as a comedy of errors.

These conclusions are indicated by contrary historical trends. The assumption of copious so-called sideline cash entering the market has consistently proved faulty in past bull markets.

This time around, expectations for this seem particularly great, amplified by the current scenario of elevated rates, declining inflation and a Fed rate cut in September seen this time to be the first in a relatively tight series.

Yet, huge amounts of cash in the economy are nothing new. The historical reality is that cash tends to transmute not into stock holdings, but into other forms of cash, because many people like it. For them, cash is king. Even many stock investors like to hold a certain amount of it — for spending, emergencies, and just in case they want or need it for something.

Historically, large amounts of cash in money markets, savings accounts, checking accounts and other highly liquid repositories have regularly hit new highs — not just during the low interest rate period of the early 2020s.

And for the past 20 years, figures for cash as a percentage of total assets have been pretty steady, according to data from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department.

Cash in the U.S. economy in all forms now amounts to more than $18 trillion. Though this is up nearly 40% from 2019, it’s actually down as a percentage of total household wealth, as stock holdings have grown 50% during this period.

Cash to Cash

Over the last decade, as interest paid on traditional savings accounts has dwindled, more people have opted for the liquidity of checking accounts and literal cash. As renowned economist Kenneth Rogoff notes in his 2017 book, “The Curse of Cash: How Large-Denomination Bills Aid Crime and Tax Evasion and Constrain Monetary Policy,” large bills ($50 and $100 notes) are in relatively short supply because people are hoarding them in home safes as unreported cash income or as gains from illegal activities.

In recent years, the percentage of cash in money market funds has, of course, increased with higher yields at a time when long-term Treasurys posted one of their steepest declines ever.

The notion that this cash must be on the launching pad for investment in stocks is nothing more than an assumption, perhaps driven by psychological projection among stock investors who wouldn’t dream of keeping substantial amounts of their money out of this bull market.

This assumption may largely hinge on the mistaken belief that this cash came from the market originally. But it probably didn’t.

Data shows that the lion’s share of cash in money market funds came from lower-yielding cash accounts — checking accounts and savings accounts. Further, brokerage sweep accounts aren’t money market accounts, and pay a fraction of the interest. So investors must actually buy shares to get money market interest.

To the extent that liquidity-loving individuals have moved cash to money markets in recent years to get 4%-5% interest, history shows that they might be just as inclined to keep much of it in checking accounts or lock it up at home when money market rates head downward.

That this is an unwise choice in a strong bull market doesn’t decrease its likelihood.

However, when money market rates do decline, some individuals will probably be inclined to invest some of this cash in what will then be superior-yielding long-term bonds. And some of this cash may find its way into dividend stocks for holding long term. But this won’t be a Ganges River of cash by any means.

The real folly of believing in this mythical river of cash flowing into the market is that, even if it happened, it wouldn’t drive up stock prices much because for every buyer, there’s a seller. If one player on the sidelines enters the game, one on the field must come out (except sometimes in the penalty-prone NFL).

A scenario of more buyers than sellers for a given stock can naturally elevate that stock’s price for a while. Yet, of course, what propels the overall market upward in a lasting way isn’t buyers and sellers taking turns holding shares of some stocks, but widespread value creation — true growth stemming from rising profits and earnings, the lifeblood of public companies.

Tasty Stew

Currently, the overall political-economic environment is highly conducive to this organic growth.

The Republican sweep in the November election bodes well for the corporate benefits of less regulation and lower taxes. And this sweep comes amid favorable economic factors, including stable prevailing interest rates, declining overall inflation and high productivity, which enables the economy to grow apace amid low unemployment without pushing up inflation.

Together, these factors amount to a tasty stew that investors will probably enjoy as it simmers through 2025, if not longer.

If the Fed ends up doing a significant series of rate cuts in 2025, as originally projected, fixating on money market cash might prove to be a harmful distraction from actual viable strategies. A better course is to sample sectors giving the stew its pleasing flavor.

Basing investment strategies on inflows of a mythical river of cash, rather than on fundamentals such as earnings projections, could leave a sour taste in some investors’ mouths.

Dave Sheaff Gilreath, CFP, is a founder and chief investment officer of Sheaff Brock Investment Advisors, a firm serving individual investors, and Innovative Portfolios, an institutional money management firm. Based in Indianapolis, the firms manage assets of about $1.4 billion.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center