Edward Jones, Cambridge and Osaic to Pay Clients $8.2M Over Excess Fees

December 20, 2024 at 01:20 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • The firms failed to provide available mutual fund sales charge waivers and fee rebates on mutual fund purchases.
  • None of the firms had a supervisory system reasonably designed to supervise whether eligible clients got fee waivers.
  • As a result, customers did not receive the rights of reinstatement benefits to which they were entitled.
/contrib/content/uploads/sites/415/2023/06/Rockville_FINRA_640x640.jpg

The Financial Industry Regulatory on Friday ordered Edward JonesOsaic Wealth and Cambridge Investment Research to pay more than $8.2 million in restitution to clients harmed by the firms’ failures to provide available mutual fund sales charge waivers and fee rebates on mutual fund purchases.

"Each of the three firms failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to supervise whether eligible customers received available mutual fund sales charge waivers and fee rebates through rights of reinstatement," according to FINRA.

As FINRA explained, "many mutual fund issuers offer a right of reinstatement, which allows investors to reinvest in shares of a fund or fund family after previously selling shares without incurring a front-end sales charge, or to recoup all or part of a contingent deferred sales charge."

As a result, clients did not receive the rights of reinstatement benefits to which they were entitled, totaling over $8.2 million. 

As a result of the failures:

  • Edward Jones customers paid $4,440,979 in excess sales charges and fees from January 2015 to June 2020;
  • Osaic Wealth clients (and those of its affiliated broker-dealers) paid $3,096,490 in excess sales charges and fees from January 2017 to August 2020; and
  • Cambridge Investment Research customers paid $699,217 in excess sales charges and fees from January 2015 to March 2022.

Without admitting or denying the charges, each firm agreed to repay affected clients, including interest.

FINRA did not impose any fines in connection with the matters in recognition of each firm’s extraordinary cooperation with FINRA’s investigations, the broker-dealer self-regulator said in a statement.

The three settled matters are each the result of a targeted examination initiated in 2020 and executed by Member Supervision’s Examinations and National Cause and Financial Crimes Detection programs.

FINRA has secured over $9.5 million in restitution for affected mutual fund customers across five firms related to that targeted exam.  

“Obtaining restitution for harmed customers is a top priority for FINRA. It is essential that firms ensure their customers receive all fee waivers and rebates owed,” said Bill St. Louis, EVP and head of Enforcement at FINRA.

“At the same time, FINRA recognizes firms that proactively correct errors, identify and repay harmed investors and provide substantial assistance to FINRA during its investigations,” he added.

An Edward Jones spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor via email that the firm "cooperated fully with FINRA and [is] pleased to have resolved this matter. We take this matter seriously and have made enhancements to our policies, procedures and practices. Our top priority remains serving our clients and helping them achieve financially what is most important to them and their families.”  

Osaic and Cambridge declined to comment on the matter.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center