State insurance regulators have something in common with consumers and their health insurance advisors: problems with getting authoritative advice about Medicare enrollment rules.
Members of the Senior Issues Task Force, an arm of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, talked about the problems last month in Denver, at an in-person session at the NAIC's fall national meeting.
Insurance regulators told Molly Turco and Kathryn Coleman, two officials at the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, about their difficulty with finding out what CMS wants them to tell consumers when a Medicare Advantage plan shuts down, makes big changes to its provider network or cuts medications from the list of drugs it covers.
Eric Dunning, Nebraska's insurance director and a former government affairs director at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska, said getting a four-paragraph letter from CMS responding to questions took Nebraska six months, according to draft meeting minutes posted on the Senior Issues Task Force website.
In some cases, Nebraska insurers that ask CMS the same question get different answers, Dunning said.
Jill Kruger, an official with the South Dakota Division of Insurance, said that, as of the date of the session in Denver, her state had not received any response from CMS to its questions.
Nevada Insurance Commissioner Scott Kipper suggested that CMS could ask for help with communications from states' State Health Insurance Assistance Program offices.
Turco told the regulators that CMS is trying to develop a better, official process to get state officials the information they need more quickly.
Shortly after the meeting, CMS sent the task force a document providing answers to many of officials' questions about the rules for consumers affected by Medicare Advantage plan exits and benefit changes.