What Trump's Win Means for Estate Tax Planning

Analysis November 06, 2024 at 02:29 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Republican control in the White House and Congress makes extension of the 2017 tax overhaul likely.
  • The historically high estate tax exemption is probably here to stay, one tax expert says.
  • Major changes to the income tax, or its outright elimination, will be a lot harder.
Former US President Donald Trump, center, greets attendees following a news conference at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, US, on Thursday, Aug. 15, 2024

Donald Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election, combined with the Republican Party's forthcoming control of the U.S. Senate and potentially the House of Representatives, makes it likely that key parts of the 2017 tax overhaul will be extended before the bill sunsets at the end of 2025.

This includes the historically high estate tax exemption, the higher standard deduction, the lower income tax brackets and the restructured alternative minimum tax framework that has resulted in fewer Americans facing AMT payments on tax day.

That was the perspective shared early Wednesday in an interview with Ben Henry-Moreland, a senior financial planning "nerd" with Kitces.com. Henry-Moreland noted that the dust hasn't settled on the election, with control of the House being an important factor in the tax policy discussion, but his gut tells him that Republicans are poised for a clean sweep in Washington.

"I would say that, at this point on Wednesday morning, we are probably looking at a Republican trifecta in the White House and in both chambers of Congress," Henry-Moreland said. "As such, our base case is now to assume that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act law will be extended."

There is even the possibility that Republicans could seize on this moment to repeal the estate tax entirely — as was proposed in the original version of the 2017 tax overhaul.

"That's now a real possibility, but I should offer a caveat by saying that the estate tax exemption has already been raised high enough so that it only applies to relatively few families — only to the wealthiest Americans," Henry-Moreland explained. "So, it might not be a priority compared with other potential policy changes."

Another important factor, he said, is that Trump has voiced a number of big plans with respect to mass deportations and other policy efforts that would cost the federal government a lot of money.

"So that fact makes me less confident that they would be able to outright eliminate the income tax and replace the revenue with tariffs, as Trump has floated on several occasions," Henry-Moreland observed. "It might be more possible to restructure the income tax so it doesn't apply to tips, overtime or Social Security, as he has said he wants to do."

The tax policy landscape always comes with uncertainty, but financial planners are probably safe in assuming that the estate tax rules aren't going to change dramatically at the end of 2025.

State Taxes and Other Considerations

Henry-Moreland said it is likely that many financial planners and clients who have been feeling pressured to consider making major estate planning decisions ahead of the TCJA sunset are now going to be hitting the brakes. But that doesn't mean it is appropriate for all clients to change their plans for late 2024 and 2025.

"It's worth remembering that a number of states have their own estate and inheritance taxes to consider," Henry-Moreland explained. "Most states have a lower exemption than the federal one. So, trust planning activity that is about getting money out of the estate to avoid different states' estate taxes is likely to continue."

While the estate tax exemption is likely to be a hot talking point in the months ahead, it is less significant than other tax policies, given that only several thousand of the wealthiest families find themselves subject to estate taxes in any given year.

"I think we're also likely to see some debate about the state and local tax deduction cap issue and the alternative minimum tax policies," Henry-Moreland suggested.

Since the tax overhaul was enacted in 2017, few households have been subject to the alternative minimum tax. That's because the law essentially restructured the AMT to apply mainly to a select number of upper-income households.

With the anticipated sunset of the tax overhaul in 2026 and the reversion to the pre-2018 AMT rules, a large subset of households would have found themselves owing AMT — many for the first time. Now, it seems likely that the current framework will be extended, as will the rules around state and local tax deductions and the higher standard deduction.

"On the SALT issue and the higher standard deduction, the main effect we have seen is that it has kept people from itemizing deductions," Henry-Moreland said. "Another knock-on effect of the policy is that charitable giving trends have shifted to favor strategies like making qualified charitable distributions from retirement accounts and bigger contributions to donor-advised funds."

More on the AMT

Henry-Moreland said it has been interesting to see how the different parts of the 2017 tax overhaul have played out in recent years, especially with respect to how the originally maligned SALT cap rules have not had as much of a negative impact on taxpayers in high-tax states as originally anticipated by some parties.

"Remember that, before 2017, a lot of people who did have high deductions for state and local taxes were also exposed to the alternative minimum tax," Henry-Moreland noted. "As a result, they weren't getting the full value of those deductions anyway prior to the TCJA changes. When TCJA happened, a lot of people didn't end up paying much more in taxes, thanks to the AMT rule changes and just because rates were lowered generally."

At the very high end of the income spectrum, people in the top brackets in the highest-tax states have theoretically owed more taxes. But many of these people are business owners who can use pass-through entities to help reduce what they ultimately pay in taxes each year.

"I would say that, for the majority of advisory clients in that income range of $200,000 to $500,000 or so, they haven't ended up paying more in taxes under the current framework," Henry-Moreland said.

A Second Opinion

Written comments shared Wednesday by Leslie Gillin Bohner, the chief fiduciary officer and general trust counsel at Fiduciary Trust International, echoed much of Henry-Moreland's perspective.

"I believe there is clarity," Bohner wrote. "Most 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act provisions will likely be extended. So there is no rush to change estate plans and most individuals can adopt a wait-and-see approach and do planning on their own timeline to use their remaining exemption amounts."

There may be other tax cuts, Bohner added, but it is too soon to tell while we wait to see if the GOP retains control of the House.

"It is always a good time to review existing plans in light of life changes, such as divorce or death of a spouse, and to make sure that you have the foundational documents such as wills, financial and healthcare powers of attorney in place," she concluded.

Credit: Bloomberg

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center