Trump's Tariffs, Tax Plans Could Bankrupt Social Security by 2031: Report

Analysis October 21, 2024 at 02:45 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Researchers warn cutting taxes on Social Security benefits, tips and overtime would leave Social Security insolvent years earlier.
  • A Trump campaign spokeswoman disputed that conclusion, arguing pro-growth policies would help fund the program.
  • But the analysis warns that relying on potential growth — not specific policies to fix the program — is risky.
Donald Trump speaks during a campaign event in Green Bay, Wisconsin

A new analysis published by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget warns that eliminating taxes on Social Security benefits, tips and overtime would cut up to three years off the Social Security program's projected solvency — advancing the insolvency date from 2034 to as early as 2031.

Former President Donald Trump has repeatedly pledged to enact these policies while on the campaign trail, according to the CRFB, which advocates for narrowing the gap between how much revenue the federal government raises and how much it spends.

"President Trump's proposals to eliminate taxation of Social Security benefits, end taxes on tips and overtime, impose tariffs, and expand deportations would all widen Social Security's cash deficits," the authors warn. "Under our central estimate, we find that President Trump's agenda would increase Social Security's 10-year cash shortfall by $2.3 trillion through FY 2035."

If such policies were enacted and nothing was done to shore up Social Security, the federal government would need to make a 33% across-the-board benefit cut, the CRFB warns. This projected cut is up from the 23% that the Congressional Budget Office projects under current law.

"Social Security will be only nine years away from insolvency when the next President takes office," the authors note. "If President Trump's campaign agenda were enacted in full, we estimate it would shrink that window by one-third, to only six years."

Asked for a comment on the CRFB report, Karoline Leavitt, the Trump campaign's national press secretary, shared the following statement: "The so-called experts at CRFB have been consistently wrong throughout the years. President Trump delivered on his promise to protect Social Security in his first term, and President Trump will continue to strongly protect Social Security in his second term."

The statement then attacked the positions of the "dangerously liberal Kamala Harris" before arguing that Trump's policies would support Social Security by "unleashing American energy, slashing job-killing regulations, and adopting pro-growth America First tax and trade policies."

"President Trump will quickly rebuild the greatest economy in history and put Social Security on a stronger footing for generations to come, all the while eliminating taxes on Social Security for America's well-deserving seniors," the statement concludes.

Tips, Taxes and Tariffs

Ending taxation of Social Security benefits might sound like a winning proposition, the authors admit, but it would actually would eliminate a revenue stream currently used to help finance Social Security. Ending all taxes on overtime pay and tips would have a similar effect by reducing payroll tax collection accruing to the Social Security trust funds.

Imposing large tariffs on imports would not directly affect Social Security's bottom line, but it would raise the prospect of higher inflation, according to the analysis, which would either increase annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) or reduce taxable payroll through slower growth.

The authors further warn that deporting large numbers of unauthorized immigrants would reduce the number of immigrant workers paying into the Social Security trust funds, adding yet more strain to the Social Security system.

"Under our central estimate, we found these policies would add about $2.3 trillion to Social Security's cash deficit between FY 2026 and 2035 — which is about 1.8% of current law taxable payroll once phased in," the authors explain.

This includes $950 billion from ending the income taxation of Social Security benefits, about $900 billion from ending payroll taxes on tips and overtime pay, and roughly $400 billion from changes to tariffs and immigration.

"Under our low-cost scenario, we estimate the Trump campaign's policies would add $1.3 trillion to Social Security's 10-year cash deficit, and under our high-cost scenario they would add $2.8 trillion," they add. "This would represent 1.0% to 2.2% of payroll."

Other Effects to Consider

As a result of these higher cash deficits, Social Security trust fund reserves would be depleted much faster than under current law.

"Whereas CBO projects the trust funds to run out of money in FY 2034, we estimate they would run out of money three years earlier under President Trump's agenda, in FY 2031," the researchers warn. "Upon insolvency, the law calls for limiting Social Security spending to its revenue stream, which we've previously estimated would mean a $16,500 cut in annual benefits for a typical dual-income couple retiring in 2033."

Under President Trump's agenda, they estimate that benefit cut would total 33% by 2035, with a range of 29% to 36% depending on the scenario.

"Importantly, this cut somewhat overstates the average effect on beneficiaries, as ending taxation of benefits would increase average after-tax benefits," the researchers point out. "In our central estimate, real after-tax benefits would be cut by the full 33% for about half of beneficiaries — those at lower income levels who don't currently pay taxes on benefits."

In comparison, benefits would be cut by closer to 30% for the seniors with just enough income to be paying taxes on benefits, 26% for a household with income in retirement at about $100,000 per year, and 3% for the very highest income households.

"Avoiding these cuts would require significant adjustments to Social Security taxes or benefits," the authors conclude. "Under our central estimate … restoring solvency would require the equivalent of cutting all current law benefits for current and future retirees by roughly one-third or increasing all current law taxes by roughly one-half."

Faster growth can reduce Social Security's shortfall, the authors concede, but based on available analyses and understanding the effects of President Trump's agenda on the national debt, it is unlikely his plans would significantly boost the size of the economy — and many estimates find his plans would reduce long-term output.

Credit: Bloomberg

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center