Lawsuit: Schwab Let Scammers Drain Life Savings of 91-Year-Old Customer

Schwab ignored red flags and its own elder financial abuse guidance, the federal lawsuit alleges.

Charles Schwab & Co. failed to protect a 91-year-old customer from scammers who drained more than $278,000 in savings from her accounts — including funds meant to pay for her senior housing — a civil lawsuit filed this month alleges.

Ruth Rootenberg, who at one point purchased gold for the scammers and handed it to a runner outside her Los Angeles retirement community, contends Schwab knowingly allowed her to fall victim to a government-impersonation scam from February to April this year.

Schwab’s representatives and “inadequate policies, procedures and controls” failed to protect a frail, vulnerable customer when they wired the funds from Rootenberg’s accounts on three occasions without performing sufficient risk assessment, according to the lawsuit filed Sept. 6 against the brokerage and affiliated Charles Schwab Bank in U.S. District Court for central California.

Schwab failed to follow its own guidance on senior investors and elder financial abuse, according to the lawsuit.

“Without question, the evildoers are the unknown criminals who orchestrated the elaborate scheme to convince Ms. Rootenberg that her identity was stolen and that someone from the government was going to help her,” the complaint says.

“The crime, however, depended on the aid and material contribution” from Schwab, it contends.

The suit, which includes photos described as showing Rootenberg, now 92, leaving her mobility chair to hand gold to the runner, alleges she purchased gold “from companies that a Schwab investigator admittedly knew to be tied to prior scams.”

Suspicious Transfers

“This case involves more than just red flags,” the lawsuit contends, explaining that Rootenberg had reported a suspected hack before losing money from her Schwab accounts. Her daughter, who was a designated contact on the Schwab accounts, “begged Schwab to do something because of suspicious circumstances,” it says.

Schwab repeatedly blocked and unblocked Rootenberg’s accounts while allowing her life savings to slip out of them, the suit contends, saying the company knew their customer was being scammed and was privy to numerous red flags in Rootenberg’s Schwab checking account and two brokerage accounts.

Red flags included out-of-character large and frequent transactions, big influxes of money to Schwab accounts as the scammers drained Rootenberg’s non-Schwab accounts, constant money transfers between Schwab accounts, and wires out of the accounts, “including to companies that Schwab admittedly knows had been associated with scams of other customers in the past,” the suit contends.

Schwab violated California’s Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act and its Unfair Competition Law, according to the lawsuit, which alleges the brokerage and bank knew that Rootenberg’s banking and investment activity mirrored the hallmark signs of financial elder abuse.

Among other points, the lawsuit alleges:

Schwab Responds

A Schwab spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor by email this week: “We sympathize with Ms. Rootenberg, whose exploitation by unscrupulous criminals is a stark example of the devastating impact of imposter fraud. We advise our clients to be cautious and skeptical and verify any unexpected requests before acting.

“As the federal government notes, balancing an individual’s autonomy, safety and privacy is challenging. In this case, Schwab used its best efforts to help Ms. Rootenberg achieve that balance by involving her family and reporting the issue to Adult Protective Services, state securities regulators and law enforcement. We disagree with the allegations in the complaint and will respond in the appropriate forum.”

Photo: Bloomberg