Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Stock chart numbers

Portfolio > Economy & Markets

Industry Groups Cheer T+1 as a Success

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • In May, the securities transaction settlement cycle was shortened from two business days after the trade date to one
  • The move has reduced settlement risk and enabled firms to better use their capital, SIFMA, ICI and DTC say.
  • Moving to T+0 would create new risks and complexities, the groups warn.

The move to T+1, the shortening of the securities transaction settlement cycle from two business days after the trade date to one, was successful, according to a new report released by the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the Investment Company Institute and The Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.

“After more than three years of rigorous and coordinated activities to plan for — and ultimately implement — a shortened settlement cycle, the industry is recognizing reduced settlement risk across the U.S. capital markets,” the T+1 After Action Report states. “Firms are now able to make better use of their capital while promoting financial stability. Ultimately, T+1 has provided the appropriate balance between increasing efficiencies and successfully mitigating risk for the industry.”

The move to T+1 started in late May.

SIFMA, ICI and DTC warn, however, that moving to T+0 (or same-day settlement) is not simply the next step in the process.

“It would require a comprehensive independent review,” the groups said. “While T+1 has brought many benefits, further accelerating to T+0 as an industry standard could introduce significant risks and complexities. Instead, the focus should remain on global market adoption of T+1.”

The group outlined in a joint statement why the move to T+1 was successful, as demonstrated by the following metrics:

Affirmations:

  • Nearly 95% of transactions are meeting the affirmation criteria by the 9:00 PM ET cutoff on the trade date, as set by DTC. “This marks a notable improvement from the 73% affirmation rate recorded at the end of January 2024,” the groups said.

Clearing Fund:

  • “In a T+1 environment, the NSCC Clearing Fund decreased on average by U.S. $3.0 Billion (23%) from the prior three-month average value of U.S. $12.8 Billion in a T+2 environment to U.S. $9.8 Billion,” the groups said. “The NSCC Clearing Fund decreased on average by U.S. $2.4 Billion (20%) from the prior month average value of $12.2 Billion in a T+2 environment to U.S.$9.8 Billion post T+1 implementation.”

Fail Rates:

  • The average continuous net settlement fail rate — the percentage of long or short positions that do not settle on the settlement date — for July 2024 was 2.12%, consistent with T+2 settlement rates.
  • Similarly, the average DTC non-CNS fail rate was 3.31%. Again, consistent with T+2 settlement averages.

In July, the Securities and Exchange Commission launched a sweep of advisors’ compliance with T+1.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.