Merrill Fined $3M Over 'Deficient' Trade Surveillance

News August 30, 2024 at 11:19 AM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Merrill relied on third-party automated systems that were insufficient to monitor for manipulative trades, FINRA says.
A Merrill Lynch branch office

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority has fined Merrill Lynch $3 million for failing to have a supervisory system reasonably designed to detect and prevent potentially manipulative trading by the firm's customers.

According to FINRA's order, from December 2015 to the present, Merrill "relied on a number of third-party automated surveillances to surveil for potentially manipulative activity, including wash trading and prearranged trading. These surveillances were deficient in several respects."

The order states that $669,000 of the $3 million must be paid to FINRA and the rest to several stock and option exchanges.

First, the parameters in the firm's automated surveillance system "were too narrow to identify potentially manipulative wash trading and prearranged trading," the order states.

For example, the parameters unreasonably limited the firm's surveillance "for potential wash trades to trades that (1) occurred between the same account and were executed simultaneously (or later during the relevant period, in some cases, within ten seconds); or (2) occurred for the same volume and price, and were reversed back to the original account."

Merrill also did not take reasonable steps during the relevant period to determine whether these parameters were reasonable or whether changes to the parameters or additional surveillances were necessary to reasonably surveil for wash trades and potentially manipulative prearranged trading.

"The firm could not explain why it initially selected the particular modules that it used or why it did not select other modules that were available from the vendor," the order states.

Further, "although the firm's procedures included a review process for one of its surveillance systems, the procedures provided insufficient guidance regarding how parameter change decisions should be made or documented."

Also, at certain times during the relevant period, Merrill excluded from its surveillances trading in over-the-counter securities and warrants.

Wash Trading Failures

"Between July 2017 and October 2018, Merrill failed to have a surveillance system in place to detect wash trading. prearranged trades, matched trades or spoofing and layering in OTC securities because Merrill had failed to purchase the OTC data feed from its third-party vendor," the order states.

Prior to January 2019, Merrill had no system to detect wash trading in warrants.

"Although Merrill's surveillance system was capable of surveilling for wash trading in warrants in 2016, because of a coding error, Merrill did not include warrants in the surveillance modules until January 2019," according to the order.

From October 2016 to August 2020, Merrill failed to review alerts generated by three of its wash trading and prearranged trading surveillance patterns in equities and options.

"The firm did not discover the issue until August 2020, when responding to a regulatory inquiry, even though there were numerous red flags, such as internal testing results, that should have alerted the firm to the fact that these alerts were not being reviewed," FINRA said.

Overall, Merrill "did not review approximately 155 alerts representing approximately 700 potentially manipulative equity trades and approximately 1,000 alerts representing approximately 125,000 potentially manipulative options trades," according to FINRA.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center