Life Settlement Hopes Are No Excuse for Underfunding a Policy Today

Expert Opinion August 30, 2024 at 04:05 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Many universal life policies are designed to last only to age 90.
  • Premium payment requirements are often flexible.
  • The investors that buy in-force policies prefer well-funded policies.
A money maze

We recently encountered a producer who was selling a universal life policy to a 50-year-old male that was being purchased for estate planning purposes.

His illustration showed a premium level that would only fund the policy to age 90.

When asked what happens if the insured lives beyond age 90, his response was, "I tell the client not to worry; we can do a life settlement." This is very concerning advice, both from a life settlement standpoint and from an insurance planning perspective.

Planning for a life settlement at some remote future time is, generally, not a particularly good idea.

Why the Safety Net Is Not a Good Default Option

The ups and downs of the marketplace, as well as the unpredictability of one individual's future life expectancy, make it impossible to contemplate the future value of a policy with any degree of confidence.

Furthermore, the percentage of face amount likely to be obtained with a settlement will pale in comparison to receiving the full face amount of the policy upon death and will, therefore, undoubtedly, fail to achieve the estate planning objectives.

While the likelihood of obtaining a life settlement offer certainly increases with age, the cost to investors to continue the policy until the insured's death is a significant factor in determining the life settlement value.

Typically, the cost to carry a policy beyond age 90, that is underfunded or beyond its no-lapse guarantee, is prohibitive.

Policy Funding Math

For example, a competitive $1 million universal life policy issued on a 50-year-old male with guaranteed funding only to 90 could require additional premiums totaling over $900,000 to keep the policy going from age 91 to age 100, once the initial premium guarantee expires.

Alternatively, a competitive current assumption policy, funded only to age 90, could cost over $1.5 million to keep it in force from age 91 to age 100.

The high cost to carry such underfunded policies significantly limits the potential life settlement proceeds and, possibly, the ability to get a settlement offer at all! In a nutshell, thinking that a life settlement can bail out a poor funding decision is a fallacy.

But there is even a bigger picture problem than just life settlement value.

The overall funding of a life insurance policy intended for estate planning purposes needs to be viewed with due regard to life expectancy.

What most people don't realize is almost 1 in 3 healthy 50-year-old males live past age 90, so roughly one-third of these policies based on age 90 mortality will run out of funding prior to death.

In other words, the policies will die before the insureds!

Choices

While retirement income planning frequently targets funding only to 90 or 95, there are many opportunities along the way to adjust the plan based on the health of the individual as they age.

Retirement planners have many levers that can be pulled to adjust the plan, such as: working longer, saving more, lowering spending and investing more aggressively.

Additionally, some income sources like Social Security, pensions and life annuities continue regardless and represent some floor level of income no matter how long one lives.

An underfunded life insurance policy offers little flexibility in planning, while an overfunded policy offers a lot.

If an insured's health deteriorates to such an extent that longevity is unlikely, the ongoing premium amount can be reduced accordingly.

But for an underfunded policy, when the realization hits that the policy is underfunded due to the insured's good health and longevity, the additional premium required may well be unaffordable.

Additionally, if the policy is, in fact, no longer wanted or needed, the well-funded policy will likely have greater potential value on the life settlement market.

How much does it cost to fund a policy on a 50-year-old to age 100 rather than 90? Looking again at a competitive guaranteed universal life policy, the additional annual premium is only about 7.7% more, and the additional premium for a current assumption policy would only be about 5.2% more.

The difference seems like a bargain to gain all that flexibility years later when it could be badly needed.

While a life settlement is a great way to extract some salvage value from a policy about to be surrendered or lapsed, it should not be used as a crutch to validate underfunding a policy.

Instead, policies should be adequately funded, leaving the insured in the most flexible position possible — whether living, dying or selling.

As potential life settlement situations come up, remember, "It can't hurt to try — it can only hurt not to!"

Credit: Andrii-Vodolazhskyi/Shutterstock


Robin Weinberger and Peter KatzRobin S. Weinberger, CLU, ChFC, CLTC, is the director of national accounts for Life Insurance Settlements Inc. She has been a general agent and director of national accounts for Connecticut Mutual and vice president of marketing for Sun Life of Canada. She can be reached at [email protected] or (617) 451-3343.

Peter N. Katz, JD, CLU, ChFC, RICP, is a life settlement broker and co-director of national accounts with Life Insurance Settlements. He is also a consultant specializing in life insurance advanced sales illustrations, and he has served as an advanced markets attorney and in product development. He can be reached at [email protected] or (860) 937-2936.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center