This is the latest in a series of articles featuring Social Security claiming case studies drawn from the ALM publication "2024 Social Security & Medicare Facts," by Michael Thomas with support from Jim Blair, a former Social Security administrator, and Marc Kiner, a planning expert with extensive experience in public accounting.
The Scenario: Two Above-Average Wage Earners
Bob and Lisa are a married couple who have no former spouses or children eligible for benefits on their earnings record.
Bob is a high wage earner, and Lisa is an above-average wage earner. They are close in age, so Bob and Lisa's full retirement ages are both 67.
Bob has an actuarially projected death age of 85, and his full retirement benefit at age 67 is $2,540. Lisa has a longevity projection of 87, with a full retirement benefit of $1,777.
Under this set of assumptions, the couple has as many as nine reasonable options for claiming their benefits, and the difference between the maximal and minimal projection is significant — nearly $170,000.
As the authors explore, the primary factors to take into consideration depend on when the couple wants benefits to begin. In general, benefits before full retirement age will lower the monthly benefit amount, and this reduction is permanent.
Generally, the importance of survivor benefits will determine if Bob's benefits are taken at age 62, age 70 or somewhere in between.
What the Numbers Show
The least effective strategy would see Bob file in September 2024 at age 62 for a reduced worker benefit of $1,788. Lisa also files at age 62 several months later, in February 2025, for a reduced worker benefit of $1,251. She eventually switches to a survivor benefit of $1,788.