Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
image of a magnifying glass being held over a social security card

Retirement Planning > Social Security > Claiming Strategies

Social Security Claiming: The Case of a Couple's Many Choices

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This is the latest in a series of biweekly articles featuring Social Security claiming case studies drawn from the ALM publication “2024 Social Security & Medicare Facts,” by Michael Thomas with support from Jim Blair, a former Social Security administrator, and Marc Kiner, a planning expert with extensive experience in public accounting.

The Scenario: An Age Gap and Unequal Earnings

Paul and Kirsten are a married couple five years apart in age.

Having been born in December 1958, Paul will reach full retirement age at age 66 and eight months, at which time his full worker benefit is $2,418. Kirsten, born in December 1963, will reach full retirement age at age 67.

Given her lower lifetime earnings relative to Paul, Kirsten’s full worker benefit is $1,182.

Kirsten has an actuarially projected death age of 87 and is expected to survive Paul by about eight years. Paul’s projected death age, in turn, is 84.

The couple has as many as nine claiming scenarios to consider, and the difference in projected lifetime payments between the most- and least-optimal approach is nearly $130,000. Particularly important to the outcome is the link between Paul’s claiming decision and Kirsten’s anticipated survivor benefit.

What the Numbers Show

The least effective claiming strategy analyzed by the authors would have seen Paul file for a reduced worker benefit in January, garnering him a monthly benefit of $2,162. Kirsten is assumed to file in December 2033 for her maximum worker benefit of $1,465, and she eventually switches to a survivor benefit of $2,162.

This results in a projected lifetime benefit for the couple of $877,611.

A small jump in benefits comes from assuming that Paul makes the same claiming decision, while Kirsten elects to file at age 62 in January 2026 for a reduced worker benefit of $832. Kirsten also files at this time for a spousal benefit that “tops off” her own benefit, raising it to $849.

Kirsten eventually switches to the survivor benefit ($2,162), resulting in a projected lifetime benefit of $887,426.

A sizable jump in benefits comes from assuming that Paul waits until April 2025 to file for his full worker benefit of $2,418, while Kirsten again waits until December 2033 to file for her full worker benefit. She later switches to a bigger survivor benefit ($2,418), resulting in a projected lifetime benefit of $915,637.

Another modest increase in benefits comes from assuming that Paul waits to file until August 2025 for his full worker benefit of $2,418, while Kirsten files for her minimum benefit of $832 in January 2026.

Kirsten again files for a spousal benefit to top off her own benefit, later switching to the survivor benefit. This garners a projected lifetime benefit for the couple of $925,452.

A far bigger jump comes from assuming that Paul waits for December 2028 to file at age 70 for his maximum worker benefit of $3,062.

Kirsten does the same and files at age 70 in December 2033 for her maximum worker benefit of $1,465, and she eventually switches to the survivor benefit ($3,062). This approach gives a projected total benefit amount of $992,153.

The superior approach, according to the authors, adds another $15,000 to the total.

This is achieved by assuming that Paul again waits to file for a maximum benefit at age 70 of $3,062. However, Kirsten is assumed to claim in December 2030 for her full worker benefit of $1,182, and she also files at that time for her spousal top off benefit, boosting her check to $1,209.

Kirsten once again later switches to the survivor benefit of $3,062, resulting in a total projected benefit of $1.01 million.

Credit: Chris Nicholls/ALM/Adobe Stock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.