Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Hand passing key to child's hands symbolizing wealth transfer

Retirement Planning > Saving for Retirement

Should Clients Share Wealth Sooner Rather Than Later?

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Many wealthy people choose to pass on wealth why they die, but that's not the only way.
  • Experts say passing on assets during one’s lifetime can have big benefits, both psychological and practical.
  • Beyond alleviating financial stress, early inheritance can provide a test run for future big gifts.

It’s not very often that a tweet about retirement income planning goes viral, but that’s exactly what happened to a recent post on the social media platform X by Adam Harding, a financial advisor and founder of Harding Wealth in Tempe, Arizona.

The post tells of a recent meeting in which Harding sat down with a client who is 73 and in good health. She has two kids, ages 42 and 47, along with one 13-year-old grandson.

Importantly, Harding wrote, the client has “plenty of money” for a comfortable retirement, while the next generation in the family is facing some degree of financial strain in meeting daily expenses and savings goals.

“The conversation was mostly focused on estate planning and encouraging her to feel okay giving money to her adult kids,” Harding recounted in the post, which has amassed more than 10 million views and several thousand comments.

But the big concern from the client turned out to be more about the timing of such gifts: Is it somehow wrong or inappropriate to give money to the next generation today rather than doing the traditional thing and waiting for the end of life? Could such gifts somehow negatively affect the relationship across the generations?

Harding’s response to this client’s concerns was to use the power of visualization to extoll some of the underappreciated virtues of legacy giving with a “warm hand.”

“Here’s what I said to her,” Harding wrote. “Think about life 20 years from now. You’re 93… Your kids are in their 60s and your grandson is 33. Then they’ll inherit your money. However, at that time everyone is fairly settled into who they are and what they’ll become.”

Harding then compared that outcome with the decision to give a gift today.

“Your kids are at a place in their lives where a financial gift can have a trajectory-altering impact,” Harding wrote. “Consider the ripple effects of removing a bit of financial stress from the parents of a 13 year old. I’ll help ensure your needs are met for the rest of your life, but if you see an opportunity to help the people who matter to you, seize it.”

A number of retirement planning experts asked by ThinkAdvisor to assess the post said they fully agreed with Harding’s take, and they said they weren’t necessarily surprised to see just how much the discussion has resonated with the public.

Many of a given advisor’s clients are likely asking themselves similar questions about the best ways to enact their legacy giving goals, they noted, and so its important for financial professionals to raise what can be an uncomfortable topic. Doing so can help clients experience the joys of giving while they are around to see the impact.

Seeing the Impact Brings Added Joy

The extensive sharing and discussion of Harding’s X post came as no surprise to Tamiko Toland, the co-founder of IncomePath and former TIAA executive.

“This type of a discussion and goal-setting is actually at the heart of the IncomePath ethos,” Toland said. “Part of our process is helping clients understand how to handle any surplus wealth they might have as they manage their retirement — and legacy giving is usually a big part of that discussion.”

The thought of heirs inheriting substantial wealth upon one’s own death brings a lot of happiness and comfort to people as they face their own mortality, Toland said, but that’s a very abstract type of happiness.

“On the other hand, it’s such a joy for people to be able to see the impact they are having with their own eyes,” Toland said. “They can see how their own hard-earned wealth is providing a lot more quality of life and relieving some of the financial tension in their family. Or maybe the stakes are lower and they’re just taking the family on a big vacation.”

In either case, the earlier use of the wealth is deepening the family connection while the older generation is still living, and that can be a beautiful thing for all involved, Toland explained. It’s also not worth getting caught up in concerns about whether the money is better off staying invested, so that it can be a bigger gift later in life.

“That perspective is kind of missing the bigger picture that the size of a gift in dollar terms doesn’t necessarily define its importance or impact,” Toland said. “And the next generation can always choose to save and invest the money for their own future retirement, if that’s the best outcome.”

A Test Run for Bigger Gifts

Among those in agreement with Harding and Toland is David Blanchett, head of retirement research at PGIM DC Solutions.

Blanchett pointed to many of the same arguments as Toland, noting that a smaller gift given at a critical time earlier in life can have a much bigger “utility effect” versus a bigger gift that comes later, at a time of presumably greater economic stability for the recipient. The giving generation also benefits more in being able to see their giving have an effect with their own eyes.

“There is obviously a balancing act that you’ve got to play,” Blanchett said. “You don’t want to imperil your own retirement situation by doing things like, for example, paying for college for the grandkids. But assuming this isn’t an issue, it’s great to give with a ‘warm hand.’”

But there’s also another reason to consider accelerating some portion of the legacy giving plan — and that is to ensure that those who receive the inheritance can actually handle it. This is especially true for the wealthiest clients who may end up passing on many millions of dollars (or more) to various people and causes at the end of their life.

“Giving early can do a lot to show you if the person is prepared to inherit potentially significant wealth,” Blanchett said. “If you’re planning to give $1 million to each of your grandkids, for example, you could start by giving them each $50,000 and seeing how they manage that.”

It’s less about “testing” the next generation and more about being realistic about the way sudden, big inheritances can be a lot for people to handle. The receipt of smaller gifts earlier in life can help to build a younger person’s sense of financial responsibility, potentially helping them become a better steward of the family legacy.

“Whatever the case may be, it will be useful for you to know and to see how that money is received,” Blanchett said. “It may give you a lot of added confidence about your future giving goals, or it may help you to refine your giving plan.”

Credit: Adobe Stock 


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.