For the Right Investors, Private Markets Make Sense: Mercer Exec

Q&A July 26, 2024 at 02:34 PM
Share & Print

Donald Calcagni, Mercer Advisors chief investment officer

Donald Calcagni, Mercer Advisors' chief investment officer and investment committee chair,  steers strategy for the $60 billion firm's offerings. 

Calcagni, who has held various positions with Mercer over the past decade, appears in interviews with major financial media outlets, including Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal, and his expertise includes portfolio management, fiduciary oversight, corporate finance and taxation. His responsibilities also include advising Mercer's private market funds.

Under Calcagni, Mercer Advisors became the first independently owned RIA in the United States to sign the United Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment initiative, according to his LinkedIn profile.

Calcagni spoke with ThinkAdvisor this week to answer several questions about his market insights. Responses have been edited for length.

THINKADVISOR: What is your current take on the markets, a segment or sector that you think is really interesting now, and why? What does this mean in terms of specific holdings?

DONALD CALCAGNI:  I think equity markets are overstretched. I think valuations are high. That's a broad comment. When you look at the S&P, it's currently trading at 21 1/2 times (forward earnings estimates). By any historical measure that's pretty high, and so that's a concern. It's not a huge bearish concern, but it's definitely a concern. 

My bigger concern within the S&P 500 is really those Magnificent Seven stocks. They've done amazingly well. That's great. They've had amazing earnings growth, but their projected earnings growth beginning in Q4 of this year is projected to really come in line with the future expected earnings growth of the broader market. Which means at that point they candidly no longer become special.

And that's going to begin to impact their valuations. … Tesla's getting beat up a little bit, they disappointed on earnings, and so we'll see if that pattern persists across other technology companies. But at the moment that's probably my biggest bearish concern when I look inside public equity markets.

As we're witnessing this rotation out of megacap technology and into small cap — we saw that start to really take off here over the past two weeks — and there's a lot of reasons why that's the case. So I think small cap in public equities is very interesting given where we're at with respect to interest rates and the Federal Reserve.

Are there any specific areas within small cap that you favor at the moment or are staying away from?

I think those companies that have floating-rate debt, which is about 30% of the Russell 2000. I wouldn't get too excited about any sectors. I think that's the wrong way to look at it. I would look at those companies that are either unprofitable or marginally profitable that could become profitable, or even more profitable, in the event that the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates. 

Because as the Fed brings rates down, those companies with floating rate debt are going to be well positioned to profit from that.  All of that cash flow that was otherwise going towards their interest expense will now fall to the bottom line. So that's a great place to be. 

What is your biggest bullish feeling now and why?

Within public markets it would be small cap. But I think investors can do better in private markets because that's the private market equivalent of the small caps generally. 

Private equity with the right managers, and that's a huge caveat, with the right managers, over the next seven to 10 years — remember, private investments are very long-term investments — as interest rates come down are probably poised to do even better than the Russell 2000. 

But that's only for investors who are willing to commit capital for a seven- to 10-year period. Private equity — what I'll call middle-market and lower-middle-market companies — that's how we refer to companies in private markets. 

And would investors do that by investing directly in a company or in some kind of a fund?

Always a fund. They should never do an individual company. So they should invest in, and again, we're talking vehicles that are open only to qualified purchasers, so this would be investors with $5 million or more in investable assets and they have to make sure that they're selecting the right managers. 

This is a market unlike public markets, where candidly, most managers don't add any value in public markets because they're so brutally competitive. Private markets is the complete opposite. There is a significant opportunity for very good fund managers to add significant value. The best way to do that would be to work with a good advisory firm or if you have access on your own and you know which managers are good. 

There are more alternative investments now available to mom-and-pop retail investors, but this area is still kind of a high net worth, it sounds like.

Correct. And most of the alternative investments that are available to what you characterize as mom-and-pop investors, frankly, aren't very good. Most of them are pretty, pretty horrible, to be honest.

In our judgment, those are areas where most investors should probably be careful, especially if it's a publicly traded investment. You want to be careful.

Arguably, those returns aren't any better than just owning an index fund, and yet they tend to have very high expenses. So investors should be very cautious when it comes to trying to invest in these alternatives that are designed for, quote, Main Street.

What's your biggest bearish view or concern and why?

Mega-cap technology. Markets tend to get really excited about something new, and we love things that have done very well in the immediate near term. That's recency bias. Investors get super excited about companies like Nvidia and these are amazing companies, but typically investors and markets get too excited and they tend to get overstretched. 

So at least in the short term, it would seem to me that we're going to see some of the buying pressure come out of those companies over the next several months. And so that would be my short-term concern within public markets. I think that's probably my biggest bearish call at the moment. 

What's your top advice to advisors on helping clients now? Anything specifics regarding strategic moves?

I'm a big proponent of private investments and the reason I say that is only about, say, 15% of the world's investment opportunities are publicly traded. And so if you're serious about delivering high-quality diversification to your clients, I would encourage advisors to seriously look at private investments. By which I mean private equity and private credit, private real estate and private infrastructure.

They need to be careful. They need to make sure they understand those asset classes. So the advice I give my own advisors is that some of the most important continuing education you can invest in right now as an advisor is learning about private investments, learning the nomenclature, learning the different metrics that we use to evaluate performance. All of that is very different in private markets than it is in public markets. 

But given that public markets are a relatively narrow slice of the investment opportunity set for investors, I think over the next 10 years, it'll be critically important that advisors begin looking for opportunities — high-quality, low-cost opportunities to add private investments to client portfolios.

It's important for me to also clarify. I don't mean all of what I consider to be investment gimmicks, things that don't make sense for most investors. Things like commodities, trading pools, things like cryptocurrencies. I don't think those are legitimate investments. 

When I mention high-quality diversification, I mean actual investments, owning companies, lending capital to growing companies and somehow participating in the profits, the free cash flow that those companies generate. I don't mean fancy trading strategies, I don't mean things like that. 

Who and what are you watching now, whether a key indicator, policy move or particular person?

Well, there's a lot that I look at, but if there's one number that I think ultimately is the most important number to watch it is the Fed funds rate, interest rates set by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Because that will influence the price of every investment on planet Earth. So I think that is the most important number to pay attention to. 

Not the election, not the candidates. I know we're all talking politics these days, but I actually think that's less material than the interest rate that the U.S. Federal Reserve sets for the U.S. economy. 

My view is that the Fed probably won't cut rates until the very end of this year after the election. Only because the Fed generally tries to stay out of politics and not make it look like they're trying to influence any particular political election. So my view is they'll start probably in December. The market currently thinks they're going to start in September. I think it'll be December. 

Pictured: Donald Calcagni

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center