Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
SEC Regulation Best Interest

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > SEC

It's Time for a Reg BI Crackdown at SEC: Ex-Commissioner

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Reg BI is falling short of its goal, industry leaders including former SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson argued in a recent panel discussion.
  • Form CRS needs improvements, Jackson said.
  • Reg BI is not enough to protect investors if the DOL fiduciary rule is vacated, the panelists agreed.

The Securities and Exchange Commission needs to step up enforcement actions related to Regulation Best Interest, a panel of industry experts — including a former SEC commissioner — agreed Wednesday during a webinar held by the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard.

When asked by ThinkAdvisor during the webinar what’s next for Reg BI actions at the SEC, former SEC Commissioner Robert Jackson, who’s now a law professor at NYU Law School, responded that while the SEC under chairman Gary Gensler “has done important things on Reg Best Interest … it’s long past time for some enforcement actions to make clear what their expectations are,” and not just release FAQs on the rule.

Reg BI, said Jackson, who voted against the rule when it passed in 2019, ”has not fulfilled all its purpose; in my view, it is one small area where we should be talking about protecting these ordinary investors.”

Joseph Peiffer, president of the Public Investors Advocate Bar Association (PIABA), added in response: “Well, I hope something’s coming. I’m sick of being the front line on this. Really what that means is, that the investors and retirees that we represent are on the front lines of enforcement on this. And what does that really mean? It means that someone has to come to me to get their life savings back.”

The SEC has “got to bring some real enforcement actions, which we just haven’t seen a bunch of, even at FINRA,” Peiffer said.

“The number of Reg BI-related cases brought by FINRA is under 100, in the country,” Peiffer continued. “They have the vast resources of the SEC, and I’d like to see them do something with it.”

Dearth of SEC Actions

Law firm Gibson Dunn stated in late June that while there’s been a dearth of enforcement actions brought by the SEC related to Reg BI, more inquiries by the securities regulator are likely on the way.

The law firm stated that the SEC thus far “has seemed content” to leave enforcement to FINRA, which has settled roughly 30 Reg BI enforcement matters since 2020, when Reg BI took effect.

Rina Hussain, associate director of the SEC’s broker-dealer exam program, said at the SEC Speaks conference held by the Practising Law Institute in early April that Reg BI will continue to be an exam priority for the SEC in 2025 — with likely areas of focus to be on complex or illiquid products.

FINRA has more enforcement cases related to Reg BI as the disciplinary actions “have been increasing,” Bill St. Louis, head of FINRA enforcement, said on April 22. “We have brought cases involving the Customer Relationship Summary form (Form CRS), excessive trading, complex products and variable annuities, with more in the pipeline,” St. Louis said.

Form CRS Is ‘Bad’

Jackson noted on the webinar that the agency also needs to make improvements to the customer relationship summary, known as Form CRS.

“After I stepped down from the SEC something happened, I got Form CRS,” Jackson said. “My financial advisor sent me Form CRS and I must tell you I opened it and was devastated to see how bad it is.”

Added Jackson: “There is muddled disclosure about the actual conflicts faced, there’s very little information about how the advisor is paid, and it [Form CRS] achieves almost nothing. That’s an extraordinary thing to say in light of the low standard that SEC disclosures have provided.”

In the next five years, Jackson said, the agency needs to not only work on making Form CRS “more useful for ordinary investors,” but also provide “detailed explanation about why risky products would ever be in retail investors’ best interest when Reg BI itself” says they rarely are.

Reg BI Is Not Enough

When asked during the webinar if Reg BI could provide sufficient investor protection if the Labor Department’s new fiduciary rule is torpedoed, the participants echoed a collective “no.”

(See related story: DOL Fiduciary Rule Halted by Texas Court)

Reg BI “only covers retail investors,” said Phyllis Borzi, former head of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration, who moderated the panel discussion. ”And in the world of employer-sponsored retirement programs, advice to plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries, none of that is covered,” Borzi said. “The only agency that has the legal authority to cover that is the Department of Labor.”

The SEC’s jurisdiction, Borzi reminded attendees, “is limited to securities.”

The fact that Reg BI doesn’t cover plan sponsors, Peiffer said, means the SEC rules ”might cover when I go into my broker’s office and he gives me some advice … but if I go in as Joe Peiffer, founding partner of Peiffer Wolf Carr Kane Conway & Wise with 100 employees that we have to take care of and we have to devise a 401(k) plan for them to invest in, the advice that I get there is not covered by Reg BI, and would only be covered by the DOL rule.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.