Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Inherited IRA written on piggy bank

Life Health > Annuities

New RMD Regs Back Annuity-Based Stretch IRAs, Advisor Says

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • The IRS brought back the old rules for what happens when individual retirement annuity holders die.
  • Some wealth advisors have wondered what those rules really mean now.
  • Gary Mettler believes passing on a lifetime retirement annuity is different from passing on an ordinary IRA.

The new final IRS retirement account inheritance regulations may include an escape hatch from the regular required minimum distribution rules.

Federal law usually requires a client with traditional retirement account assets to begin taking RMDs at age 73. The goal is to force the client to pay some of the income taxes deferred when the client contributed earnings to the account.

But federal laws and regulations once set different rules for holders of single-premium immediate annuity contracts held inside individual retirement annuities, and the new final RMD regulations revive the traditional SPIA framework, according to Gary Mettler, a Boca Raton, Florida-based SPIA specialist.

“Consumers will be so much better off,” Mettler said in an email.

He created an 80-year-old model client with a $4,590 RMD and $100,000 for an IRA SPIA based on his interpretation. He found that the model client could increase the amount of RMD passed on to a grandchild by about 70% for the rest of the client’s life, to about $1,700 per year.

What it means: If Mettler is right, the new RMD regulations will give some clients who have plenty of income a way to reduce RMDs and increase the amount left to beneficiaries.

RMD basics: Clients who contribute to Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k) plan accounts start by paying their federal income taxes, then put some of what’s left over into the accounts. The government has promised to let the Roth account users take cash out of the accounts without imposing federal income taxes on the distributions.

When clients contribute to traditional IRAs and traditional 401(k) plan accounts, they put off paying federal income taxes on the earnings going into the accounts.

The IRS and its parent, the U.S. Treasury Department, see the IRA income tax deferral as a “tax expenditure,” costing the government $25 billion per year in desperately needed revenue.

Federal law tries to pull in the deferred income taxes by making traditional retirement account holders take RMDs.

SPIAs: Federal tax rules also encourage people to use single-premium immediate annuity contracts in retirement annuities, in the hope that IRA SPIAs will keep retirees from falling into poverty.

A SPIA is an arrangement sold by a life insurance company that turns one large cash payment, or lump sum, into a stream of income payments.

A retiree can buy a SPIA that provides a guaranteed stream of retirement income for life or a “period-certain” SPIA that provides retirement income for a set number of years.

Advisors have been promoting the use of certain types of immediate annuities to ease the sting of RMD rules since at least 2001.

The IRS adopted regulations governing how taxpayers can pass IRA SPIAs on to beneficiaries in 2006.

Recent RMD developments: Before 2020, many wealth advisors said a wealthy client could use a “stretch IRA” strategy to defer and minimize RMD-related income taxes.

An older client would put assets in a traditional IRA and name grandchildren or great-grandchildren as the beneficiaries.

When the original owner died, the assets stayed in the IRA.

The beneficiaries then used age-based RMD formulas that minimized annual RMDs and RMD-related income tax bills.

A provision in the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (Secure) Act of 2019 banned the standard stretch IRA strategy, which usually relied on ordinary IRAs, rather than individual retirement annuities, for most beneficiaries.

The provision, which took effect in 2020, requires beneficiaries who inherit traditional IRAs to empty out the assets, and put the distributions in their taxable income, within 10 years.

SPIAs and Secure Act: Mettler argued that the Secure Act’s 10-year IRA asset distribution limit had no effect on IRA SPIA inheritance.

He argued that wealth advisors could still use IRA SPIA contracts to create a stretch IRA, as long as the stretch IRA is based on individual retirement annuities.

The relevant rules for passing IRA SPIAs on to survivors and beneficiaries are in IRS regulations section 1.401(a)(9)–6, which went missing in the IRS’ first Secure Act regulations, then showed up again in the draft IRS RMD regulations posted in 2022.

Mettler maintained that the revived section 1.401(a)(9)–6 should work the way it did in the past and that the draft regulations supported his position.

Critics argued that the income annuity provisions in the draft regulations applied only to income annuities held inside 401(k) plans and other retirement plans.

“At this time, I was personally attacked for my views,” Mettler said in the email.

Now, passages on pages 18, 37 and 39 in the PDF version of the new final regulation packet clearly support the view that the pre-2020 SPIA rules continue to apply to IRA SPIAs, Mettler said.

Internal Revenue Code Section 1.408–8—Distribution Requirements for IRAs now states that the minimum RMD required for an individual retirement annuity “is determined in accordance with the rules of § 1.401(a)(9)–6,” and that should reinstate the old IRA SPIA beneficiary rules, he said.

Mettler believes that the main change will be that the maximum cost-of-living adjustment that can be included with an eligible IRA SPIA will increase to almost 5%, from 2% before.

Adding a rich COLA will decrease the amount of initial income a taxpayer can squeeze from a dollar of IRA SPIA premiums.

For low-income clients, that would be a disadvantage.

For high-income clients, choosing a higher COLA should increase how much of the RMD value, and RMD-related income taxes, a client can pass on to a beneficiary, Mettler said.

The disclaimers: David Sterling, an attorney in the Sarasota, Florida, area who once served as co-chair of the American Bar Association’s Insurance and Financial Planning Committee, praised a version of Mettler’s RMD regulation interpretation that Mettler posted Monday on LinkedIn.

But the underlying regulations and Mettler’s interpretation of the regulations are complicated. Mettler himself emphasized that an IRA SPIA is an expensive, permanent product.

“Owners and their families will have these contracts for the rest of their lives,” Mettler said. ”You want to make sure the stretch IRA/SPIA complements the estate planning process.”

That means clients should look at the IRA SPIA option and other options carefully with their lawyers, accountants and other advisors, Mettler said.

The new final regulations: Mettler noted that the rules for a period-certain SPIA, or an annuity designed to pay income for a limited period, rather than throughout the owner’s life, are different than the rules for lifetime IRA SPIAs and are more like the rules for ordinary traditional IRAs.

That means a life insurer will have to come up with a mechanism for condensing the payment period for a period certain annuity with a term of longer than 10 years to just 10 years.

The typical beneficiary who inherits a period certain annuity will want the insurer to pay the benefits out in the form of a lump sum, Mettler predicted.

Whether the SPIA is a period-certain contract or an annuity designed to pay benefits for the client’s life, or the life of the client and another individual, is just one of the questions that can affect what RMD rules apply.

Another important factor is whether a second individual is classified as a joint owner of an annuity or simply as a beneficiary.

The RMD rules for a spouse or other joint owner are more generous than the rules for beneficiaries.

Beneficiaries fall into two categories: designated beneficiaries and eligible designated beneficiaries.

The RMD rules tend to be more generous for “eligible designated beneficiaries” than for other beneficiaries.

Eligible designated beneficiaries include:

  • Children under age 21.
  • People who are no more than 10 years younger than the annuity owner.
  • People with disabilities.
  • People who are chronically ill.

When individuals in many categories end up with lifetime IRA SPIAs, the RMDs will depend on life expectancies predicted by the IRS Single Life Expectancy Table.

Credit: Adobe Stock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.