Wells Fargo Profiled Customers, Fired Banker Alleges

News July 23, 2024 at 02:45 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • The banker said managers started closely scrutinizing his work, even his fonts, after he reported ethics issues.
  • Wells Fargo's retaliation has kept the banker from finding new work in the industry, the suit alleges.
  • Thomas Davis served affluent customers, managing $192M in assets, the suit says.
Judge with a gavel

A fired Wells Fargo personal banker has sued the financial giant, alleging that the company retaliated against him after he reported that managers improperly encouraged bankers to profile prospective customers based on race and physical appearance, including apparel brand.

Thomas Davis, in a lawsuit filed Sunday in U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, accuses Wells Fargo of retaliation for good-faith reporting of racial profiling and ethics violations and several other alleged violations, including disability discrimination and breach of implied contracts.

As a personal banker hired by Wells Fargo in 2016, Davis managed a book of business worth more than $192 million in direct assets, according to the lawsuit, which says he was promoted in 2019 to senior branch premier banker, responsible for providing services to affluent customers. 

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority's BrokerCheck database lists Davis as a former RIA and broker.

In 2022, Davis, who had received four promotions over six years, "reported how his managers were requiring junior team members to identify and weed out potential customers by using racial and socioeconomic markers," according to the complaint, which seeks a jury trial. He also reported a pay disparity between his position and junior positions he was coaching, the lawsuit states.

"After making his reports, Mr. Davis was disproportionately scrutinized by superiors on elements of his work and in April 2023, he was investigated for alleged unethical behavior," then was "pulled into numerous meetings" regarding his scheduled Family and Medical Leave Act/short-term disability leave.

Wells Fargo "recalled Mr. Davis early from previously approved leave to summarily terminate his employment," the suit alleges. Davis was fired in July 2023, according to the lawsuit and his FINRA record.

Davis alleges claims for relief for unlawful retaliation and discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, unlawful retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, and unlawful interference and retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act, as well as civil rights violations under Colorado law.

He alleges that Wells Fargo incorrectly reported the reasons for his firing to FINRA on his U5 termination form, and that those details "continue to impair Mr. Davis's ability to be re-employed in the only industry he knows. Specifically, Vectra Bank and FNBO have both rejected his candidature because of his Form U5, events (that Davis) experiences as post-employment retaliation," the complaint says.

Davis' FINRA record states: "Banker terminated by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. after admitting improper manipulation of incentive system by submission of an invalid partner referral. No customer harm identified."

In September 2022, Davis filed a complaint through a Wells Fargo ethics line that managers had implemented "pre-appointment assessments" for prospective customers based on race and physical appearance to determine which products would best suit them — a violation of company policy — he alleges in the lawsuit.

"Mr. Davis was told to implement the assessments and he witnessed junior bankers implementing the assessments," the lawsuit contends.

He also reported that a manager placed pressure on him and other employees "to meet unrealistic sales goals in investments, loans and deposits to avoid a negative performance review or termination."

In November 2022, Davis grew concerned that his pay was substantially lower than that of peers with less tenure and significantly less experience, and discovered that the lowest wage offered for more junior positions paid more than what Wells Fargo was paying him, the suit says.

Davis reported the pay disparity to his district senior manager, who demanded he stop discussing wages with coworkers, saying that doing so violated Wells Fargo's policy, the lawsuit says. Other managers also told him to stop talking about his wages, saying it was a terminable offense, according to the complaint.

Wells Fargo started scrutinizing Davis' performance "much more closely, even critiquing the font Plaintiff used in his email signature. WF began monitoring Plaintiff's work calendar and claiming that his performance was unsatisfactory. Mr. Davis's performance reports went from the 'highest possible' rating and 'outperformer' to 'needs improvement' with no WF feedback as to how or why," he alleges.

The lawsuit details several alleged retaliatory acts, escalating to an April 2023 ethics investigation against Davis for alleged unethical behavior; an investigator told him the probe would be closed as there was no evidence to support unethical behavior on his part, according to the complaint.

He also applied for medical leave for surgery and recovery, but a new manager told him he would be allowed only two weeks for recovery rather than the six weeks that doctors recommended, the suit alleges. Davis was pressured to return to work, unhealed, while on FMLA leave, and fired that day, the complaint says.

A manager "instructed a co-worker not to help Mr. Davis to his vehicle when being walked out of WF at termination, despite him displaying limitations in walking post-surgery and his car and office displaying a disability placard," the lawsuit contends.

Davis appealed his dismissal, despite being told incorrectly that it wasn't appealable, and "discovered that there was no record of misconduct in his employment file. However, the termination decision was upheld on appeal," the complaint states.

A Wells Fargo spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor by email Tuesday: "Wells Fargo has investigated these allegations and found them to lack merit. We do not tolerate discrimination, and we value and promote diversity, equity and inclusion in all aspects of our business and at all levels. In addition, Wells Fargo has extensive policies and procedures related to prohibiting retaliation as well as providing leaves and accommodations for employees."

Davis was active as a licensed financial advisor under Wells Fargo but did not act in that capacity with the company, his lawyer, Dipak Patel, told ThinkAdvisor by email on Tuesday. He was a premier banker and a conduit to the advisory side. Rather than actively manage portfolios, Davis managed the relationship and built specialist teams based around client needs, Patel explained.

The fired banker has been volunteering with the SIFMA Foundation, Habitat for Humanity and a local parks and recreation board, his lawyer said.

Image: Adobe Stock

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center