Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
A judge holding a gavel in a court room

Regulation and Compliance > Litigation

Ameriprise, LPL Battle in Court Over Father-Son Advisor Duo Who Switched Firms

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Ameriprise says two advisors took confidential material before leaving for LPL.
  • LPL contends Ameriprise is trying to intimidate advisors and stifle competition.
  • The advisors agreed to a temporary injunction, putting their part of the case on hold.

Ameriprise Financial Services and LPL Financial are facing off in court and with arbitrators over a father-son advisor team who Ameriprise alleges took confidential information in “the dark of night” before leaving the broker-dealer for competitor LPL.

While Ameriprise contends its rival regularly encourages recruits to violate contracts with firms they’re leaving, LPL accuses Ameriprise of trying to intimidate advisors who might want to leave and stifling competition in the financial services industry.

In a complaint filed June 4 in U.S. District Court in Michigan, Ameriprise sought a temporary restraining order against LPL, Mitchell McCann and his son Wesley McCann pending a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration.

On Monday, the court agreed to stay the case against the McCanns only and approved a temporary injunction that Ameriprise and the McCanns agreed to, pending the FINRA arbitration, resolving Ameriprise’s request for a temporary restraining order against the two advisors.

The case as it pertains to LPL has not been stayed.

Actions Allegedly ‘Rife With Misconduct’

The temporary injunction prevents the McCanns from soliciting their former Ameriprise clients and from using Ameriprise’s confidential information, and required them to return any confidential records to Ameriprise and provide a list of those who received a mass email from the advisors around April 15.

“Mitchell’s and Wesley’s pre- and post-termination behavior has been rife with misconduct and transgressions, supported, and encouraged by LPL,” Ameriprise alleged in the complaint, contending the McCanns have violated their contractual agreements with Ameriprise as well as the broker protocol governing use of client information when advisors switch firms.

Broker-dealer Ameriprise also alleges the father-son advisory team, which operates Guardian Partners Wealth Management in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, violated the law by soliciting and taking confidential information related to their former clients.

Among other allegations, Ameriprise contends the McCanns, before resigning, “preemptively violated the protocol, their duties of loyalty to Ameriprise and their agreements,” by pre-announcing their planned transition to clients, pre-soliciting clients and taking confidential documents and information.

“Leading up to their resignation on April 22, 2024, Mitchell and Wesley conducted an irregular number of print jobs and printed a total of 687 pages of documents containing specific letterhead and confidential information such as client information, names, account numbers and routing numbers,” the complaint says.

They also sent themselves 14 emails containing such information, according to the complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in eastern Michigan.

“In the days leading up their resignation, in the dark of night, after business hours, and on weekends, Mitchell and Wesley took boxes of confidential documents and information out of Ameriprise to misappropriate the material both before and after their transition to LPL,” the complaint contends.

A Client Complains

Ameriprise contends it didn’t become aware of the alleged the McCann’s resigned. On May 9, a week after LPL announced the McCanns had joined its broker-dealer, RIA and custodial platforms, Ameriprise received a formal written complaint from a customer about receiving copies of her confidential information and unredacted Social Security number from the McCanns, the complaint says.

“When the customer spoke with Mitchell and questioned why she was receiving this personal information, Mitchell stated he had all this confidential information for all the clients and all the clients were sent the same exact materials,” it states.

The McCanns are engaging in misconduct with LPL’s knowledge and support, according to the complaint, which contends LPL’s regular pattern and practice “is to encourage recruits to violate their contractual agreements.”

Ameriprise sought immediate injunctive relief —  a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction and expedited discovery — barring LPL and the McCanns from soliciting Ameriprise clients and from further using Ameriprise’s confidential and proprietary information, and compelling them to return this information.

The firm sought this action pending resolution of Ameriprise’s claims against the defendants in the related FINRA arbitration that Ameriprise commenced. FINRA has sanctioned advisors and firms for the same conduct that occurred here, Ameriprise contends.

Mitchell McCann joined Ameriprise in 2014 and Wesley McCann joined in 2018, according to the complaint. Mitchell had approximately $217 million in assets under management and serviced 169 households at Ameriprise, while Wesley had approximately $32 million in assets under management and serviced 53 households, it says.

The complaint accused the two advisors and LPL of misappropriating trade secrets and alleged breach of contract by the McCanns.

LPL, in a responding court filing, accused Ameriprise of filing the case to let advisors know they’ll be punished if they leave, and asked the court to dismiss Ameriprise’s motion for a temporary restraining order and to dismiss it from the case.

Attempt to Intimidate Advisors?

LPL called the complaint “a truly cynical attempt on Ameriprise’s part to intimidate other of its advisors who might consider leaving to join another firm, and hinder competition in the financial services space.”

“Rather than investing its time and resources into improving its business model such that accomplished advisors like the McCanns don’t feel the need to take their business elsewhere, Ameriprise would rather continue its pattern of suing advisors who leave without any reasonable basis to think these advisors have done anything wrong,” LPL said.

Ameriprise’s action “can only be meant to amplify its underlying message: if you leave Ameriprise, Ameriprise will stop at nothing to punish you. While these issues will be ultimately be decided by the multiple FINRA panels where Ameriprise’s bad-faith cases are pending, it should not be allowed to co-opt this court to intimate advisors and stifle competition.”

FINRA is the proper forum to address Ameriprise’s dispute against LPL, according to the firm, which said the McCanns, through their agreed-to preliminary injunction, will provide all information and documents that Ameriprise seeks.

LPL said in its filing that it didn’t oppose the McCanns’ preliminary injunction agreement and offered to produce any documents containing confidential information about Ameriprise clients.

LPL didn’t immediately respond to emailed and online requests for comment Thursday.

“The facts of this case are clear,” an Ameriprise Financial spokesperson told ThinkAdvisor via email Thursday. “These advisors violated the protocol for broker recruiting among other industry standards and rules.”

Scott Matasar, an attorney representing the McCanns, told ThinkAdvisor via email Thursday that his firm is defending about a half-dozen arbitration cases that Ameriprise has brought against “financial advisors who have done nothing more than choose to quit the company and move their practice to another broker-dealer.”

Matasar said he thinks financial advisors are “voting with their feet” to leave Ameriprise because it hasn’t upgraded product offerings, technology and back-office support. Ameriprise’s “misuse” of the legal system and the FINRA arbitration process “for anti-competitive purposes is reprehensible,” he said.

Ameriprise filed its court action seeking emergency relief more than month after it commenced the arbitration case against the McCanns, “showing that the firm’s lawsuit was just crying wolf,” Matasar added.

The McCanns agreed to the stipulated injunction “because they did not engage in the misconduct Ameriprise accused them of, and because they wanted to short-circuit Ameriprise’s strategy to drive up their legal costs by making them fight the company in two different forums,” Matasar said.

He called the claims against the McCanns baseless and said Ameriprise’s dispute with them now returns to FINRA “where it belongs.”

Image: Shutterstock


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.