Expect SEC Reg BI Actions to Heat Up: Law Firm

News June 26, 2024 at 02:06 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • FINRA has settled about 30 actions tied to Regulation Best Interest.
  • Two recent SEC orders are signs of a more active enforcement regime moving forward, attorneys say.
  • Reg BI will continue to be an exam priority for the agency in 2025.
The SEC's headquarters in Washington. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM

While there's been a dearth of enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to Regulation Best Interest, more inquiries by the securities regulator are likely on tap, according to the law firm Gibson Dunn.

In a recent alert, the firm states that the SEC thus far "has seemed content" to leave enforcement to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which has settled roughly 30 Reg BI enforcement matters since 2020, when Reg BI took effect.

Gibson Dunn goes on to review two SEC enforcement actions taken this year for "ordinary conflict of interest concerns," which the law firm said "are indicative of a more active SEC Reg BI enforcement regime moving forward" — particularly aimed at dually registered firms.

Rina Hussain, associate director of the SEC's broker-dealer exam program, said at the recent SEC Speaks conference held by the Practising Law Institute that Reg BI will continue to be an exam priority for the SEC in 2025 — with likely areas of focus to be on complex or illiquid products.

Recent SEC Actions

Earlier this year, the SEC ordered TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, a unit of the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, to pay over $2.2 million to settle charges that it failed to comply with Reg BI in connection with recommendations it made to retail clients to open a TIAA individual retirement account.

The administrative cease-and-desist order against dually registered TIAA was tied to Reg BI disclosure, care and compliance violations "for recommending to retail clients its 'core menu funds' that 'earned higher fees' without disclosing "substantially equivalent, lower-cost share classes of affiliated funds," Gibson Dunn states.

Dual registrants, the law firm says, "may be particularly compelling targets for Reg BI enforcement so that the SEC can make side-by-side findings, one under the Advisers Act and the other under the Exchange Act (Reg BI), with respect to the same conduct by dual-hatted representatives implicating both regulatory regimes."

This, the law firm continues, "will enable the Commission to add settled enforcement actions as 'precedent' to support the Staff's FAQs on Reg BI, which arguably seek to substantially expand the scope of the Rule, in part by conflating the distinct roles of financial advisors when acting on behalf of the investment adviser versus the broker-dealer."

On May 21, the SEC entered an administrative cease-and-desist order against dually registered Key Investment Services concerning failures to "address conflicts of interest in compliance" with Reg BI and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

In particular, the firm's representatives "recommended that clients 'transfer securities … to new investment accounts' at the firm's affiliated private bank without disclosing that the representatives would be compensated for the recommendations and resulting transfers," the alert explains.

(Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center