Labor Secretary Considers Rewrite of Pension Risk Transfer Rules

News June 25, 2024 at 01:57 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • The Labor Department posted the bulletin that shapes pension risk transfers in 1995.
  • Secure 2.0 told the department to give the bulletin a checkup.
  • One DOL concern: Whether private equity owners make use of group annuities to shed pension risk riskier.
Julie Su. Credit: U.S. Department of Labor

Labor Department officials are thinking about whether they should update pension risk transfer guidelines to reflect possible increases in the riskiness of group annuity issuers.

Experts who are advising the department disagree about whether the growing role of private equity owners and the increased use of offshore reinsurance are causing problems, according to Julie Su, the acting secretary of Labor.

The department needs to talk to more people before it tinkers with Interpretive Bulletin 95, the 29-year-old batch of "safest available annuity" guidance that shapes pension risk transfer deals, Su writes in a new report to Congress on the adequacy of the bulletin.

"Any next steps will involve public notice and comment," Su said.

But "some stakeholders are very concerned about developments in the life insurance industry that may impact insurers' claims-paying ability and creditworthiness," she said, adding that Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration believes it should continue to study developments in the life insurance industry and in the pension risk transfer market.

What it means: The acting head of the Labor Department is not sure what to think about the strength of the life insurers that sell big group annuities to pension plan sponsors.

Any changes the department ends up making could have an enormous effect on employers, the remaining defined benefit pension plans and the group annuity market.

The history: Many employers once raced to set up defined benefit benefit pension plans, or plans designed to pay a specified amount of benefits for life once the participant retires.

Defined benefit plans began to fall out of favor in the 1990s, after yields on bonds and other relatively safe, steady investments fell and the federal government put more focus on plan stability.

One way the government encouraged employers to think about pension plan stability was by having the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., the entity that backs pensions, charge shakier-looking plans higher premiums.

An employer can reduce PBGC premiums by buying a participant's pension benefits or using an annuity to fund the benefits.

Su notes that the Labor Department developed Interpretive Bulletin 95 to set general guidelines for pension risk transfers shortly after Executive Life failed. Executive Life had been a major annuity issuer in the early 1990s.

The department prepared the new Interpretive Bulletin 95 review to comply with section 321 of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (Secure) 2.0 Act. Secure 2.0 drafters asked the department to tell Congress whether it thinks the bulletin needs to be revised or supplemented with additional guidance.

The market data: Between 2015 and 2022, about 3,135 of the 39,839 single-employer defined benefit plans insured by the PBGC used either lump-sum pension benefit buyouts or annuity purchases to transfer pension risk, according to a new PBGC report cited by Su.

In 2022, the single-employer plans included in the report still had about 24 million participants, but, over the previous seven years, benefit buyouts and annuity purchases had removed 3 million participants from the PBGC's risk pool.

Pension benefit buyouts were much more common than group annuity purchases, but group annuity purchases affected more people.

In 2022, for example, lump-sum buyouts removed fewer than 100,000 people from the PBGC risk pool. Group annuity purchases eliminated the need for the PBGC to protect the pension benefits of 300,000 people.

The annuities: Some stakeholders told Labor Department officials that private equity firms are buying the annuity issuers and writing the annuities through reinsurance company affiliates based in jurisdictions with weak capital requirements.

Other stakeholders told department officials that many life insurers with traditional owners are using similar strategies, and that private equity owners may be safer than traditional owners because they have better access to outside capital, Su said.

"A few stakeholders believe that captive and offshore reinsurers may warrant more scrutiny than unaffiliated domestic reinsurers licensed in the United States, due to the difference in regulatory requirements," she added.

Whether state insurance guaranty funds provide protection that's better than or worse than PBGC pension fund insurance has been another controversial topic.

"The issues raised by stakeholders are complex," Su said. "There were few, if any, areas of consensus."

The department should get more public input and try to keep any changes to the interpretive bulletin from having unintended consequences, Su said.

Reactions: James Szostek, a vice president with the American Council of Life Insurers, said the ACLI is happy to see the Labor Department refrain from recommending any immediate regulatory changes.

"The report validates what ACLI and many other stakeholders have suggested: that the department's 1995 guidance on pension risk transfer arrangements has performed well for decades and remains relevant today," Szostek said. "Separate from today's report, the data shows little to no risk to traditional pension plan participants under a pension risk transfer."

Preston Rutledge, a former EBSA head who has served as a consultant to the ACLI, said in a separate comment of his own that he believes the Labor Department got it right by holding off any offering any new proposals.

"The department's note that the agency should further explore developments in both the life insurance industry and in the pension risk transfer marketplace is not surprising," he added. "Any review should acknowledge the strong and underappreciated state-based regulatory system."

State insurance regulators are well-equipped to monitor the annuity providers, he said.

Julie Sue. Credit: DOL

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center