Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
The IRS building in Washington

Regulation and Compliance > Federal Regulation > IRS

IRS to Crack Down on Tax-Dodging Asset Shifts

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • IRS and Treasury will issue regs to curb basis shifting.
  • Sens. Warren and Van Hollen said the move could raise $50 billion in tax revenue in 10 years.
  • Basis shifting allows wealthy individuals and partnerships to transfer assets in a way that reduces their tax basis.

The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department have announced a forthcoming crackdown on “basis shifting,” a technique that allows for complex business partnerships to move assets from one entity to another to avoid taxes.

The IRS and Treasury Department announced in a just-released notice that they plan to publish two sets of proposed regulations that would address certain basis-shifting transactions, referred to as “covered transactions,” involving partnerships and related parties.

These transactions, according to Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, “in some cases can ‘shift’ the cost basis of an asset to another entity with tax liability, lowering taxable income and therefore tax liability.”

For instance, “an asset may be fully depreciated by one partnership, sold at cost to another, and the related entity could depreciate the asset again at a renewed tax basis,” Watson told ThinkAdvisor via email.

The IRS and Treasury are targeting the practice of “shifting assets around to numerous related ‘shell’ type entities with no business purpose other than as a receptacle to receive assets, inflate basis and in essence keep depreciating the same property over and over through these different entities, resulting in large deductions, with the ultimate goal of reducing taxable income,” IRA and tax expert Ed Slott of Ed Slott & Co., told ThinkAdvisor Tuesday in an email.

These practices, Watson continued, “have generally been understood as legal tax avoidance rather than evasion, but they may fall afoul of the ‘economic substance doctrine,’ a common law idea that otherwise legal tax strategies may be disallowed if they have no business purpose or economic rationale behind them.”

The tricky part: “where to draw the line in this doctrine, as some transactions may have an economic basis and be part of tax planning at the same time (just to name one example of a complication),” Watson maintained.

The IRS and Treasury “will have their hands full getting more information from businesses to identify when these practices are occurring and businesses will need to adjust their planning departments too, assuming this survives legal scrutiny (the IRS has wide berth as of now to promulgate rules of this sort),” Watson said.

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel said the IRS announcement signals that the agency “is accelerating our work in the partnership arena, which has been overlooked for more than a decade and allowed tax abuse to go on for far too long.” The IRS, Werfel added, is “building teams and adding expertise inside the agency so we can reverse long-term compliance declines that have allowed high-income taxpayers and corporations to hide behind complexity to avoid paying taxes. Billions are at stake here.”

‘Shell Games’

Treasury and IRS anticipate that the forthcoming Proposed Consolidated Return Regulations “would provide for single-entity treatment of members that are partners in a partnership, so that covered transactions cannot shift basis among group members and distort group income.”

Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., applauded the move to end what they called “partnership shell games.”

Closing this major loophole, the two senators said Tuesday in a statement, “is expected to raise $50 billion in tax revenue” over the next 10 years.

IRS Uncovering ‘Basis Shifting’ Abuse

“For some time, complex ‘basis shifting’ strategies allowed wealthy individuals and partnerships to avoid paying capital gains taxes on certain asset sales,” Jeff Bush of The Washington Update told ThinkAdvisor Tuesday in an email.

“Selling a depreciated asset through a complex web of interconnected entities can shield capital gains,” Bush said. “On its face, this strategy is completely legitimate and has exploded in use over the last decade. But a filer can comply with the letter of the law but run afoul of the intent.”

The Inflation Reduction Act “funds additional IRS enforcement officials who are now out in the field performing audits. Scrutinizing partnerships is one of their main focuses,” Bush said.

These audits, Bush continued, “are now uncovering what the Service believes is abuse in basis-shifting strategies. Lacking legislative action on this issue, the IRS wants to categorize these transactions into two clear categories: legitimate business transactions and transactions that serve no other purpose than to avoid capital gains exposure, taxing the latter.”

Added Bush: “A court will likely settle this [basis shifting] issue on ‘economic substance.’ An economic substance decision would codify the need for a legitimate business purpose for the sale to qualify for the basis-shifting.”

That being said, “this still leaves some ambiguity in the interpretation of the use of basis-shifting,” Bush added. “Lacking the aforementioned legislative action, I think a court will eventually side with the filers on this issue. This practice will continue to face heightened scrutiny regardless of any eventual court decision.”


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.