California Could Curb Private Equity Health Deals

News June 10, 2024 at 11:22 AM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • California may let its attorney general review some investor-backed acquisitions of health care organizations.
  • A business group advisor says private equity ownership of hospitals correlates with an increase in bad outcomes.
  • A hospital group says its members need new capital, not laws pushing away new providers of capital.
A magnifying glass on a a collection of charts with the term 'private equity' in it.

Lawmakers in California are hoping that keeping private firms out of their health care market will help down the cost of health care there and maintain the quality.

California Assembly Bill 3129 would let the state attorney general review many efforts by private equity groups and hedge funds to acquire health care facilities and health care provider groups.

The attorney general would get the ability to block some deals involving nonphysician providers with annual revenue over $4 million or other health care providers with annual revenue from $4 million to $10 million.

The bill would exclude deals between an investor group and a nonphysician and some other types of deals.

What it means: Curbs on health care sector deals involving private equity might help keep clients' lists of health care providers stable.

But the curbs could hurt any business owner clients who were hoping to sell their companies to investor-backed buyers.

Passage of new health care roll-up curbs could also be a sign that state and federal lawmakers will use antitrust laws to influence all kinds of corporate dealmaking in ways that could have a long list of good, bad and hard-to-grade effects.

In the real estate market, for example, many members of the public and some policymakers have called for new limits on investors' ability to buy single-family homes.

The backdrop: California has long put tight limits on corporate ownership of health care organizations.

It allows for partnerships, nonprofit groups and health maintenance organizations to practice medicine, but it generally forbids for-profit organizations to practice medicine or other health care professions. California strongly prefers for the licensed professional to be responsible for how the professional practices medicine.

In other states, investors have bought up many related types of health care practices, such as physician group practices and dental group practices.

The Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department last month suffered a district court-level defeat in Texas over an effort to fight a private equity firm that has been buying anesthesiology practices, but the agencies have vowed to continue to fight efforts by private equity firms to roll up competing health care providers.

The FTC and Justice Department started an antitrust investigation of private equity firm involvement in health care delivery May 23.

Antitrust officials and members of the general public have also taken note of the presence of private equity-backed roll-ups in a number of other fields, ranging from property management technology to insurance sales, along with the growing presence of other types of asset managers, such as real estate investment trusts, in areas such as ownership of single-family homes and ownership of student housing.

AB 3129 details: Rob Bonta, the current California attorney general, sponsored AB 3129.

Assemblymember Jim Wood, D-Medocino, introduced the bill in February.

Assemblymember Mia Bonta, D-Oakland, Calif. — who is Rob Bonta's wife and the Assembly Health Committee chair — presided over a hearing on the bill in April.

The Assembly passed the bill by a 50-16 vote May 21.

The Senate Health Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee now have jurisdiction.

The Senate Health Committee has scheduled a June 26 hearing.

Interest groups: The list of groups that opposed the bill as of April 9 includes the California Chamber of Commerce and the California Hospital Association.

The hospital association says California needs to encourage more investors to come in and help alleviate the state's hospital capacity shortage, not scare investors away.

The list of groups supporting the bill includes the Purchasers Business Group on Health and the Small Business Majority.

"Studies have shown that private equity acquisitions have negative impacts on costs, quality, and access to care," William Kramer, a PBGH senior advisor, wrote in a comment letter in April.

"Comparing communities where private equity dominates physician specialties, a study found that price increases are up to 3 times higher; and a recent study found that private equity ownership in U.S. hospitals was associated with a 25 percent increase in hospital-acquired conditions, which was driven by falls and central line-associated infections," Kramer said.

Credit: Alfa Photo/Shutterstock

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center