Close Close
Popular Financial Topics Discover relevant content from across the suite of ALM legal publications From the Industry More content from ThinkAdvisor and select sponsors Investment Advisor Issue Gallery Read digital editions of Investment Advisor Magazine Tax Facts Get clear, current, and reliable answers to pressing tax questions
Luminaries Awards
ThinkAdvisor
Marcia Mantell

Retirement Planning > Social Security > Claiming Strategies

For Young Widows, the Best Social Security Claiming Choice Isn't Always What It Seems

X
Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

What You Need to Know

  • Welcome to Connecting the Dots, Marcia Mantell's column on real-life decisions tied to Social Security claiming and retirement.
  • Estimates from the SSA do not provide enough information for an informed claiming decision.
  • It's typically best for a widow to delay their biggest benefit until it's maximized. But even that general rule leaves advisors with dots to connect.

Deciding when a young widow should start receiving surviving spouse benefits requires detailed information about both spouses. A financial advisor recently emailed me about a new client, hoping for a quick, clear answer to his related question:

“Should a widow start taking her husband’s benefit, starting immediately, for the rest of her life?”

That’s  a loaded question. Let’s see how to get to an answer without a lot of detail.

What Social Security Provides

When people call Social Security for benefit information, they get that day’s information. In this case, the surviving wife called in April and received the following estimates:

  • Her surviving spouse benefit: $2,900 per month.
  • Her own worker benefit: $1,200 per month.

You can see from these amounts why an advisor might think it’s a good decision to claim her surviving spouse benefit now. But there are lots of missing dots.

More Information Is Critical

The advisor needs at least the following information before making a recommendation:

  • Her birthday. It’s April 3, 1961. She was 63 when she called Social Security. 
  • Her full retirement age. It’s 67. 
  • Her survivor FRA. That’s 66 and 10 months.

The advisor also needs details about her deceased husband such as his birthday, Oct. 4, 1962, and when he died, 2015.

He was only 53 when he died. Without his Social Security statement and full earnings record, the advisor doesn’t know how many credits he earned. But since she was given a surviving spouse benefit estimate, it’s safe to assume he was fully insured.

Those bits of information are important because the advisor needs to back into each primary insurance amount before helping her decide when to claim.

Backing Into PIA

Start with her own worker benefit. At age 63, her benefit is about $1,200. If she claimed that benefit today, she’s claiming 48 months before her full retirement age and locking in a 25% reduction. Therefore, her estimated primary insurance amount is about $1,600. And her maximum age 70 benefit would be just under $2,000.

Then look at claiming survivor benefits. If she claims now — 3 years and 10 months early — her benefit would be reduced 16%. Backing into his PIA, we therefore get about $3,450. That’s also her maximum survivor benefit.

To determine her best benefit combination, compare her own maximum benefit at age 70 vs. her maximum widow benefit at her survivor FRA.

The General Rule

Filling in some details still doesn’t provide enough information to answer the advisor’s question. 

In this kind of situation, start with the general rule: It’s ultimately best for widows to claim their maximum benefit between their two options. We now know in this case that her highest benefit would be her surviving spouse benefit — but only when she claims at her survivor FRA. 

Since a young widow is eligible to switch benefits, she can claim her own reduced worker benefit ($1,200/month) then switch to her full survivor benefit ($3,450) at her survivor FRA.

Connecting Dots Between Two Benefits

Even now, the advisor does not have all the necessary dots to connect, so this is only a preliminary plan. Additional critical pieces of information include: 

  • Is she still working? If so, how much does she earn? The earnings limit test applies to both worker benefits and survivor benefits.
  • Since her own PIA is relatively modest, does she also have a public pension from uncovered wages? That would reduce her own benefit by the Windfall Elimination Provision and her survivor benefit by the Government Pension Offset.
  • Has she remarried? If so, at what age?

Unless she needs to start her best benefit early, it is not a recommended strategy. Starting her largest benefit now will deliver a substantially smaller benefit throughout her oldest years. Annual cost-of-living adjustments are based on her starting benefit amount, which will be significantly smaller.

By waiting to claim her highest benefit at her survivor FRA, she can still start her own benefits now, then maximize her bigger survivor benefit. That would result in an increase of more than $550 a month. It’s worth waiting if possible.


NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.