This is the latest in a series of biweekly articles featuring Social Security claiming case studies drawn from the ALM publication "2024 Social Security & Medicare Facts," by Michael Thomas with support from Jim Blair, a former Social Security administrator, and Marc Kiner, a planning expert with extensive experience in public accounting.
The Scenario: Gap in Spouses' Life Expectancy
Mike and Leslie are a married couple almost 11 years apart in age. Under Social Security's claiming rules, their full retirement ages differ by several months. Mike reaches full retirement age at age 66 and eight months, while Leslie reaches full retirement age at 67.
With respect to their work histories, Mike made slightly less than his spouse. With respect to their projected longevity, Leslie is expected to survive Mike by approximately 12 years.
In the scenario, Mike was born in March 1958 and has an actuarially expected death age of 84, while Leslie was born in November 1968 and is expected to die at 87. Mike's full retirement age benefit is $2,023, while Leslie's is $2,198.
According to the authors, Mike and Leslie have as many as nine distinct claiming strategies to consider, and the difference in projected lifetime benefits for the couple vary by more than $130,000.
What the Numbers Say
The least efficient strategy would see Mike file at age 65 and 10 months in January 2024 for a reduced workers benefit of $1,910. Leslie would file for her worker benefit at age 62, drawing a reduced benefit of $1,547 before eventually switching to her survivor benefit of $1,910. This strategy would see the couple collect a projected $964,574 in total benefits.