The Federal Trade Commission last week issued a final rule that bans the use of non-compete agreements nationwide. The ban includes both prospective and existing non-compete agreements.
According to the FTC, the ban will affect about 30 million American workers subject to non-compete agreements. In addition, existing non-compete agreements for "senior executives" can remain in place, although no new non-competes are permitted even with respect to senior executives.
Employers are required to notify employees who are not senior executives and who are subject to non-compete agreements that they will not be enforcing those agreements.
We asked two professors and authors of ALM's Tax Facts with opposing political viewpoints to share their opinions about the FTC's complete ban on non-compete agreements.
Below is a summary of the debate that ensued between the two professors.
Their Votes:
Bloink
Byrnes
Their Reasons:
Bloink: The use of non-compete agreements severely limits the ability of employees to choose where they will use their skills. Unfortunately, outside of the upper-level-executive context, it's almost always the employer who has all of the bargaining power.
Most of the time, the employee has no choice but to sign the agreement in order to keep their jobs — that's simply not a fair way to execute a contract. Employees are prohibited from seeking out higher pay, from forming new businesses or bringing new ideas into the labor market.
Byrnes: We all know that there are legitimate reasons why employers use non-compete agreements. Businesses must be able to protect their confidential information when employees change jobs.
