Morgan Stanley to Pay $3M in FINRA Arbitration Over Deferred Comp

News March 25, 2024 at 12:06 PM
Share & Print

Morgan Stanley Building in NY

A FINRA arbitration panel has ruled that Morgan Stanley must pay more than $3 million in compensatory damages, attorney's fees, interest and case expenses to a number of former advisors who say the firm inappropriately withheld deferred compensation payments after they left employment.

The arbitration order is the latest in a lengthy and complex legal saga involving the firm's deferred compensation arrangement and its alleged refusal to pay six-figure benefits to departed advisors.

As detailed in the new FINRA arbitration order shared with ThinkAdvisor by an attorney representing some of the former advisors, the amounts of deferred compensation to be paid range from about $70,000 upward to more than $600,000, plus substantial attorneys fees and interest payments. Morgan Stanley is also ordered to pay to cover the cost of certain hearing fees, member fees and related administrative expenses.

In response to a request for comment about the order, a Morgan Stanley spokesperson offered the following: "Morgan Stanley has long offered deferred compensation to financial advisors to reward them for loyalty and good guardianship. This is not a retirement plan, as prior arbitration panels have rightly decided, and we think the panel reached the wrong result. We will continue to aggressively defend against meritless attacks suggesting otherwise."

The new arbitration ruling comes several months after a court case involving similar claims was itself ordered into arbitration by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. In that mixed ruling, the judge declared that Morgan Stanley's deferred compensation program was subject to the rules and requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, while simultaneously determining that the advisors needed to arbitrate their claims that Morgan Stanley illegally withheld certain deferred compensation payments after they chose to leave the firm.

At the time, Morgan Stanley declined to offer specific comments about the questions raised in the case or the proceedings writ large, pointing instead to the argumentation in its prior filings. In those documents, the firm argues the specific structure of its deferred compensation plan should not trigger ERISA anti-cutback protections.

Credit: Bloomberg 

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center