Advisors Face Enhanced Reporting of Say-on-Pay Votes

Expert Opinion February 21, 2024 at 03:07 PM
Share & Print

What You Need To Know

  • Institutional investment managers are required to report executive compensation votes on the new version of Form N-PX.

Rule 14Ad-1 requires all institutional investment managers, including registered investment advisors who manage client assets, subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(f) of the Exchange Act to report say-on-pay votes on the new version of Form N-PX when voting on certain types of executive compensation, including "golden parachute" compensation.

That term generally refers to arrangements with named executive officers concerning compensation (whether present, deferred or contingent) that is based on or relates to an acquisition, merger or similar transaction.

Form N-PX requires managers to disclose the number of shares voted (or instructed to be voted) and how those shares were voted, as reflected in their records at the time of filing. 

The rules do not contain a de minimis exception for smaller holdings. Even if the advisory firm is a 13(f) filer that does not vote proxies or does not vote on any say-on-pay matters, Form N-PX must still be filed. However, if an institutional investment manager is not subject to reporting on Section 13(f), the filing of Form N-PX is not required.

Section 13(f)(6)(A) of the Exchange Act defines "institutional investment manager" as "any person, other than a natural person, investing in or buying and selling securities for its own account, and any person exercising investment discretion with respect to the account of any other person."

A 2020 FAQ from the Securities and Exchange Commission clarified that banks, including their trust departments, insurance companies, broker-dealers, trustees, and investment advisors who manage private accounts, mutual fund assets or pension plan assets are institutional investment managers.

According to the SEC, a say-on-pay vote asks investors to vote on the compensation of a company's top executives — the CEO, chief financial officer and at least three other most highly compensated executives.

Those votes comprise shareholder ballots on any of three matters concerning a public company's executive compensation: 1) periodic advisory votes on the approval of executive compensation; 2) votes on the frequency with which those advisory votes should occur; and 3) votes to approve golden parachute compensation in connection with mergers and acquisitions. 

Examples of compensation include remuneration packages of executives, grants of equity to executives, performance measures related to compensation, short-term and long-term incentives.

The final rule and form amendments provide a two-part test for determining whether an institutional investment manager "exercised voting power" over a security and must therefore report a say-on-pay vote on Form N-PX: 

  1. The institutional investment manager has the power to vote, or direct the voting of, a security.
  2. The institutional manager "exercises" this power to influence a voting decision for the security.

According to the SEC, "voting power could exist or be exercised either directly or indirectly by way of a contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship." It is important to note that managers can be deemed to have exercised voting power even if they abstained from voting.

Advisory firms should also consider what written policies and procedures require any changes or additions due to the new Form N-PX reporting requirements.

Initial Form N-PX reporting will be required by Aug. 31 for the period from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Those advisory firms that vote proxies must track their say-on-pay voting activity that began on July 1, 2023.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center