Biden Administration Moves to Ban Fee-for-Service Indemnity Health

News July 10, 2023 at 03:18 PM
Share & Print

The administration of President Joe Biden has proposed sharp new limits on some health insurance products that fill in gaps in major medical insurance coverage.

Three federal agencies want to block insurers from selling indemnity health insurance policies that pay a fee for each service, pay the health care providers directly or make any direct effort to plug a patient's health insurance holes.

The agencies also want to limit the duration of any new short-term health insurance policy to an initial term of three months, along with a one-month extension.

The agencies — the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — unveiled a preliminary version of the draft regulations Friday. The draft is set to appear in the Federal Register on Wednesday.

What It Means

If you have clients who hate the idea of buying "Obamacare," or who are between jobs and want an affordable alternative to Affordable Care Act exchange plan coverage, those clients may soon face tighter restrictions on the kinds of coverage they can buy.

The Current Non-ACA Health Market

Individual short-term health insurance policies covered 173,000 people in 2021, down from 238,000 in 2020 but up from 87,000 in 2018, according to the tri-agency team officials.

Officials did not have any numbers for people covered by short-term health insurance coverage sold through associations or for people covered by other types of health policies other than major medical policies.

They cited earlier research suggesting that insurance agents might get commissions averaging 23% of the premiums for the sale of short-term health insurance and 2% of the premiums for individual major medical insurance.

The History

Most of the first modern U.S. health insurers sold indemnity policies that paid a flat fee for each service provided.

Patient advocates, many health care providers and other health policymakers later promoted a shift to a comprehensive, soup-to-nuts approach.

When members of Congress were drafting and debating the two bills that created the Affordable Care Act package of 2010, they responded to that conflict by applying strict benefits and underwriting rules to newly sold major medical coverage but excluding other, "excepted" benefits — such as indemnity health insurance, or products that were "excepted from" the old Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 major medical coverage rules — from the ACA major medical rules. Drafters also provided a separate exclusion for short-term health insurance.

The administration of former President Barack Obama tried to keep insurers from using short-term health insurance to avoid the ACA major medical insurance rules by capping the duration of short-term health insurance policies at 90 days.

Under former President Donald Trump, the agencies changed course and let short-term health insurance policies stay in place for up to 36 months.

State insurance regulators have been working at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners to update their own standards for short-term health and excepted benefits products.

The Draft Regulations

The tri-agency team that developed the new 182-page draft regulation packet plans to accept comments on the draft for at least 60 days after the official Federal Register publication date.

The team's top goal is to keep consumers from thinking of short-term health and excepted benefits products as an alternative to ACA-compliant major medical insurance, officials said.

Officials call short-term health insurance "short-term, limited-duration insurance."

In addition to capping the duration of new short-term health insurance at four months, the agencies would require short-term health insurance sellers to provide a notice declaring that the policy offered is not comprehensive health insurance, might not cover preexisting conditions and won't give the purchaser access to federal ACA public exchange premium subsidies.

The provisions for "fixed indemnity excepted benefits" would allow insurers to sell only policies that pay out a specified amount of cash over a specified period of time, such as policies that pay $100 per day when an insured patient is hospitalized.

An issuer would have to pay the cash benefit for a covered event "without regard to whether benefits are provided with respect to such an event under any other health coverage maintained by the same issuer," officials say.

High-Tech Indemnity Health

Today, some startup insurers offer policies that use mobile phone-based apps to pay a fixed amount of cash for hundreds or thousands of health care services, but not for the full range of services that would be covered by an ACA-compliant major medical insurance policy.

In some cases, patients can use debit cards provided by the insurer to pay the provider.

"By providing direct reimbursement for health care items and services to a provider or facility, these arrangements further obscure the differences between fixed indemnity excepted benefits coverage and comprehensive coverage," officials say in the introduction to the proposed regulations.

Indemnity Health Enforcement Actions

HHS, the department that oversees the ACA individual major medical provisions, says it will look closely to see whether an individual indemnity health product is really an excepted benefit or is instead comprehensive coverage that should comply with the ACA major medical insurance rules.

Holes in New Regulations

The agencies acknowledge that their draft regulations may include two holes.

One is the possibility that an individual consumer could get around the four-month short-term health insurance coverage duration limit by "stacking" policies, or buying separate short-term policies from more than one issuer.

The agencies are asking for comments about whether they should stop people from buying two more separate short-term health policies from separate insurers that are part of the same corporate family.

The second hole is the possibility that insurers could use "specified disease excepted benefits coverage," such as policies that pay benefits when an insured patient is diagnosed with cancer or has a heart attack, as a substitute both for major medical insurance and for fee-for-service indemnity health policies.

The agencies are asking commenters for ideas about how to stop that from happening.

The Reasoning

The Biden administration says it drafted the regulations because of concerns about coverage quality and concerns about non-ACA plans hurting sales of ACA-compliant major medical insurance.

Short-term health insurance issuers may see policy provisions limiting the scope of coverage as a well-established way of holding coverage costs down.

In an address at the White House that was streamed live on the web, Biden said that the effects of those kinds of provisions are unacceptable. He cited a patient who appeared at the White House address to talk about the bills from an emergency appendectomy.

"In the fine print, his plan said it would only cover a fraction of the $37,000 the hospital bill was, even though he was paying his insurance premiums every month," Biden said.

Biden also objected to rules in some states that let issuers of short-term health insurance exclude coverage for preexisting conditions.

"Just imagine if you had a heart attack and you expect your insurance company to pay for it," Biden said. "But they dig into your medical records, discover you had asthma as a kid, claim you had a preexisting condition, and then refuse to pay. Folks, that's not health insurance. That's a scam."

For healthy younger insureds who do not qualify for ACA premium subsidies, short-term health insurance may cost less than $200 per month out-of-pocket, with a deductible under $1,000. ACA-compliant coverage, in comparison, may cost more than $500 per month, with a deductible over $5,000.

Tri-agency officials acknowledged in their analysis of the possible effect of the proposed regulations that short-term health coverage seems to have displaced at least some sales of ACA-compliant coverage.

In states that let a short-term health insurance policy last for 364 days, sales of individual ACA-compliant coverage outside the ACA exchange system fell 27% between 2018 and 2020.

In states that banned short-term health insurance or limited the policy duration to six months or less, sales of individual ACA-compliant coverage fell just 4%, officials reported.

Reactions

The Association for Community Affiliated Plans, a group for nonprofit regional health plans, welcomed the proposed regulations.

B. Ronnell Nolan, the president of Health Agents for America, said federal agencies have not done enough to show how much problems with short-term health and excepted benefits are affecting consumers.

"Furthermore, consumers deserve the right to choose the health insurance plans that fit their specific health insurance needs," Nolan said. "While short-term medical plans do not fit the needs of all consumers, the consumers who do benefit from a short-term medical plan should not be penalized."

Jeff Smedsrud, a longtime player in the supplemental health benefits market, said that regulators have already been cracking down on bad products and bad sellers.

Limiting short-term health policy duration would be reasonable, but "the proposed rule goes too far," he said. "A six-month limit would better protect the millions of individuals who find themselves without coverage for a period of time."

He also questioned the Biden administration's approach to regulating fixed indemnity plan benefits, given the high deductibles many consumers face.

The White House. Credit: Shutterstock

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center