Friend of Warren Buffett Unpacks His Investing Wisdom

Q&A April 28, 2023 at 03:55 PM
Share & Print

In more than a half-century of hugely successful investing for Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffett, chairman and CEO, 92, and vice chairman Charlie Munger, 99, "have never forgone an attractive purchase because of the macro or political environment or the views of other people," Buffett wrote to shareholders in a recent annual report.

Rather, when valuing companies, Buffett "analyzes if this is a product people are likely to need no matter what, or a service they're likely to pay for no matter what," explains Lawrence Cunningham, research professor of law emeritus at George Washington University, special counsel at Mayer Brown law firm and a Buffett business friend, in an interview with ThinkAdvisor.

Cunningham, who advises companies on corporate governance and law, is gearing up to go to Berkshire's big annual shareholder meeting on May 6 in Omaha, Nebraska.

He's been attending these weekend-long gatherings for more than 25 years, and his friendship with Buffett extends to cluing in the Oracle of Omaha on acquisition opportunities.

Cunningham's new book is the 8th edition of his classic international bestseller, "The Essays of Warren Buffett" (Cunningham Group, March 2023), updated and packed with the best of Buffett's shareholder letters.

Readers will glean Buffett wisdom and straight-shooting advice that's likely to improve their investing decision-making and strategizing.

In the interview, Cunningham, editor of the book, expands on much of Buffett's investing philosophy. He also forecasts how he expects Berkshire to be run by Buffett's likely successor and other leaders.

For the last decade, in addition to Buffett, two other company executives have made investment decisions: Todd Combs, GEICO CEO and portfolio manager, and Ted Weschler, portfolio manager.

They each have a supersized portfolio and authority to make decisions on their own, according to Cunningham.

Some of Buffett's essays echo his famed advice: "Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful."

He's certainly done exactly that: "We usually make our best purchases when apprehension about some macro event [is] at a peak. Fear is the foe of the faddist but the friend of the fundamentalist," he writes.

Also part of the Buffett buffet are enlightening, perhaps surprising, pieces of advice like, "It's a mistake to distinguish between growth investing and value investing." You need to look at both when valuing a company, Buffett says.

He rejects a number of approaches to investing, insisting that "an investor will succeed by applying good business judgement [and] insulate his thoughts and behavior from the super-contagious emotions that swirl around. There are no tricks, secrets or shortcuts."

But some of the essays forecast expected negative, though realistic, changes to Berkshire's returns as time moves on.

That is, the company "is so big now that it's harder to get the kinds of returns they could when they were smaller. It's not going to be like it was in the 1970s," says Cunningham, who at George Washington founded a boot camp for aspiring Wall Street lawyers.

ThinkAdvisor recently interviewed Cunningham by phone. He was speaking from his office in midtown Manhattan.

"Outgoing, very amusing, quick-witted," not "a nerd or awkward — a salt-of-the-earth guy" is the way he describes the legendary Buffett.

Here are highlights of the interview:

THINKADVISOR: You've been attending Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meetings for more than 25 years now. What are your expectations this year?

LAWRENCE CUNNINGHAM: There aren't going to be big changes or pivots. There won't be big surprises; there almost never are.

After the eighth meeting I went to, Charlie Munger said to me, "So you got another dose of the catechism!"

That's what it's like. The basic scripture is [the same].

Let's talk about Berkshire's investments. Can you shed light on the fact that Berkshire bought a ton of Taiwan Semiconductor Co. stock in the third quarter of last year but sold most of it in the fourth? It also trimmed some of its Bank of New York Mellon and Activision Blizzard holdings.

Before the last 10 years, everyone knew it was Warren who was making all the [buy/sell] decisions.

But for the last decade, two [much] younger guys, Todd Combs and Ted Weschler, who have their own big portfolios — $20 billion or $30 billion each — basically have had independent authority. They can make decisions on their own and often do.

Did they make the decisions on the stocks I just mentioned?

[Berkshire] doesn't disclose those details.

Broadly, what's Buffett's investment philosophy?

Berkshire has two big buckets of assets. One is publicly traded stock, where they own a minority interest. They prefer to own these stocks forever but will sell. They've been nimble in buying and selling.

The second bucket is their wholly owned businesses, which they've been much more religious about never selling even if they're struggling, as long as they're not hemorrhaging cash, as Buffett has put it.

In one of Buffett's essays, he writes: "Troubled markets can be helpful to the investor if he has cash available. When prices get far out of line with values, a climate of fear is your friend. … The euphoric world is your enemy." Please explain.

Warren is a very deep skeptic of human nature, which gives rise to people saying he's a contrarian.

People tend to follow the crowd, and so we all make collective mistakes. He tries to stay out of that.

In another annual report, he wrote, "We usually make our best purchases when apprehension about some macro event [is] at a peak."

What's an example of following his own advice?

In the 2008 [financial crisis], when no one was prepared to invest a dollar in anything, he loaded up — invested tens of billions of dollars in Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Tiffany & Co., Harley-Davidson — all of which, in very short order, brought huge returns.

"It's a mistake to distinguish between growth investing and value investing. Growth must be treated as a component of value," he argues. Please explain.

When he's trying to value a company, part of it is looking at growth — what it will do tomorrow, next year and the year after that — and how much more cash they're going to generate. So, he looks directly at that rate of change.

His next step is to [ask himself], "Can I buy this — growing or shrinking — company at a price that's less than the value calculated based on that growth or shrinkage?"

So you need to look at both the growth rate and what you're paying compared to what the growth rate is worth.

In the [more than 54 years] that he and vice chairman Charlie Munger have worked together, Buffett writes, "We have never foregone an attractive purchase because of the macro or political environment or the views of other people." Please elucidate.

He means: "I can't analyze macroeconomic or political trends, and I don't listen to what other people say."

But what he can do is [analyze to determine] if this is a product people will likely need no matter what or a service they're likely to pay more for no matter what.

"If you aren't willing to own a stock for 10 years, don't even think about owning it for 10 minutes," he espouses. That sounds extreme!

The way he thinks about a stock is exactly the way he thinks about [buying] a company. He doesn't [consider it] as a stock or a fractional interest; rather, "I will now be an owner of this business."

He's always looking five years out because his theory is "I'm going to live with this. If it's a company, I don't want to sell it. If it's a stock, I'd rather not sell it."

If you think that way, you're going to be much more disciplined.

Does he base his decisions chiefly on research and his analyses?

They're definitely based on fact, but his research may not be the result of a particular research exercise.

He consumes an enormous amount of corporate reporting, a voracious reader of filings with the SEC and annual reports. He has a very high absorption rate and can connect between companies, sectors and time periods.

In one essay, he writes that "investment success will not be produced by arcane formulae or computer programs, [etc.].

"An investor will succeed by applying good business judgment [and] … insulate his thoughts and behavior from the super-contagious emotions that swirl around."

That makes sense. Please elaborate.

It's a core point: He's dismissing many rival approaches to investing, such as a school of thought that [believes] there are patterns in stock market behavior, like if the market has gone up in the shape of a hockey stick, you can expect it to fall in the shape of a candlestick. That's all hooey, he says.

What about the emotional component he mentions?

A lot of what you see in markets are swoons influenced by sentiment, hopes, dreams and fear rather than hard-headed business analysis.

He does hard-headed business analysis. That's what he thinks investing is.

"Be suspicious of companies that trumpet earnings and growth projections. Charlie and I not only don't know today what our business will earn next year, we don't know what it will earn next quarter.

"A manager that always promises to make the numbers will at some point be tempted to make up the numbers," he says. What are the implications?

There's enormous pressure from investors demanding that managers [forecast how] they're going to do next quarter. So they'll try every trick they can think of to make it, and that will sometimes mean getting really close to the line or maybe going over it. So you're counting things that aren't ripe yet.

Warren says to try to stay away from that. It's a dangerous psychological temptation.

Looking ahead, he wrote [in 2014] that Berkshire's "long-term gain cannot be dramatic and will not come close to those achieved in the past 50 years.

"Berkshire will outperform the average American company; but our advantage, if any, won't be great between 10 and 20 years from now." Why did he forecast that?

Berkshire is so big now that it's harder to get the kinds of returns they could get when they were smaller.

They're now talking about hundreds of billions, and there just aren't as many things to look at on that scale to deploy every one of those dollars.

They're not going to be laggards, though, he says. But it's not going to be like it was in the 1970s.

"The chance of any event causing Berkshire to experience financial problems is essentially zero," Buffett declares. Please elaborate.

They will always have plenty of resources to meet obligations: Berkshire keeps an enormous amount of cash locked up. I think it's now about $150 billion. Warren has a rule: "We'll always hold at least 'X' in cash."

That's a multiple of the probable losses that their insurance companies are exposed to for paying claims, which could be of staggering proportions.

After 9/11, the whole insurance industry was devastated by loss: They'd never charged premiums for terrorists flying into [buildings in New York City]. But Berkshire was able to afford the payments; others couldn't.

So Buffett is saying, "We over-reserve. We're a Fort Knox. Even if the most awful, horrific event in the world you could imagine happens, we've got it covered."

Also in his 2014 shareholder letter, he wrote: "We expect to outperform the S&P in lackluster years for the stock market and underperform when the market has a strong year." Does that always occur?

Not always, but the tendency is supported, generally. That's because as the market is rising and the S&P rises, he starts to get very skeptical that things are being overpriced and begins to deploy less capital and invest less.

So for a year or two or three like that, he's not going to be rolling with the rising boat; the S&P is going to outperform them.

But when the market starts to contract and the S&P starts to fall, he's in there buying and buying. He's going to slightly outperform in the early part of any kind of downturn and even more so in the latter part.

Do you still think that Greg Abel — Berkshire's vice chairman of non-insurance operations and chairman of BH Energy, will succeed Buffett?

I do. No one will [do] anything close to [Buffett and his investing success]. So they're splitting his job up accordingly. Greg will be the new CEO, and Todd and Ted will be the new investment officers.

Warren's son Howard will become chairman of the board.

It will be a different company. Between Greg, Ted, Todd and Bill Gates [whom Buffett designated to distribute his estate through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation], I think they'll be able to preserve Warren's principles and keep the ship sailing in the same direction.

No one is going to expect the kinds of results they got from Warren, but it's a great company.

Is Buffett leaving most of his assets to philanthropic causes?

He's got some bequests to his kids, but the Gates Foundation is supposed to sell a portion of his estate every year for 12 years and use the cash to give to whatever [Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates] think is an important charity.

What's Buffett leaving to his three children?

A tiny bit of his estate. If the estate is, say, $100 billion, it might be 1 billion to the three of them combined — but only a tiny amount, like $100,000, to each of them personally; most of it will go to the foundations each of the kids have. They have different ones according to their own priorities.

How would you describe Buffett's personality?

He's friendly, outgoing, very amusing, tells funny stories. He's quick-witted and makes funny comments right off the cuff.

He isn't a nerd or awkward. He's a salt-of-the-earth guy — and tall, about 6 feet, 2 inches or 6 feet, 3 inches.

(Pictured: Lawrence Cunningham)

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center