Social Security Has a Longevity Problem

Analysis April 07, 2023 at 01:44 PM
Share & Print

The recently published 2023 Medicare and Social Security trustees report contains many concerning facts, not the least of which is the finding that the projected insolvency date of the main trust fund used to help pay retirement benefits is set to be depleted one year earlier than previously projected — in 2033.

According to the trustees, the Social Security system has shifted from having five workers per retiree in the 1960s to having just two workers per retiree today, and while that figure will drift marginally up and down in the decades ahead, it is not expected to climb much higher than two workers per retiree at any time in the next century.

Other concerning findings show the Medicare program is also facing significant long-term financial stress, and the immediate retirement benefit cuts being projected for the 2030s — should Congress fail to act to right the program — are well in excess of 20%.

In the experience of Linda Stone, the senior pension fellow at the American Academy of Actuaries, the most concerning aspect of the report has less to do with the size of the funding problem itself and more to do with the effect the solvency shortfall would have on real-life working and retired Americans.

Simply put, the degree to which older Americans (and those with disabilities) rely on the Social Security program to manage longevity risk makes it one of the most crucial anti-poverty programs in the United States, Stone says.

A 20% to 25% reduction in what she calls the program's "already modest" benefits would put a tremendous strain on millions of seniors while disrupting the well-laid retirement plans of older Americans still in the workforce.

Stone boasts an extensive professional background as a pension actuary working in the consulting, corporate and nonprofit arenas. She says her life's work has shown her in no uncertain terms that the ongoing debate about "saving" Social Security is among the most critical public policy issues of our time.

While she stands firmly in the camp that believes lawmakers eventually will be able to craft a solution that works for the American people, the new trustees report shows the clock is ticking. And, as Stone points out, the longer Congress waits to act, the more painful the remedies may need to be.

'Scary Prospect'

Stone says the closely linked topics of longevity and life expectancy offer an important lens advisors can use to view other pressing issues in the retirement planning arena, particularly the ongoing debate about the funding of the Social Security program and the need to improve the retirement income ecosystem.

"We all know about the decline of the pension plan system in the private sector, and how this has shifted more longevity risk onto individuals," Stone says. "The appeal of pensions was the provision of guaranteed lifetime income. Clearly, that is one of the most important features of the Social Security program."

As Stone points out, roughly one in two Americans gets at least half of their retirement income from Social Security, while one in four people get more than 90% of their retirement income from the program.

"Those are really telling statistics," Stone says. "There is no question that these benefits are fundamental to retirement security and helping Americans address longevity risk."

Echoing many other retirement experts, Stone says she was troubled to see the insolvency date for the key Social Security retirement trust fund move forward by one year.

"The report suggests benefits will have to be cut by more than 20% in just a decade's time if no changes are made," Stone warns. "That's a scary prospect, and it's not going to be easy to close the funding gap. It will very likely take a combination of proposals to achieve solvency, and time is running out."

While she worries about Social Security's solvency, Stone says she is encouraged to see the ongoing improvements being made to the workplace defined-contribution plan system, especially the updates being driven by the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (Secure) Act and its follow-up Secure 2.0 Act legislation.

"We know now that access to automated [defined contribution] plans in the workplace is one of the key metrics that determine whether the typical American is on track for retirement readiness," Stone says. "In that sense, the more we can do to expand access and tailor the system to support income planning, the better off we will be."

Longevity vs. Life Expectancy

According to Stone, talking about longevity and life expectancy is complicated, and it often raises some thorny issues that affect individuals and society as a whole. From the debate about Social Security solvency to the need to solve the 401(k) plan "decumulation challenge," Stone says a better understanding of longevity is fundamental to constructive dialog.

Case in point; a recent report from BlackRock spotlights a supposed five-year difference in lifespan between men and women in the United States. While the gap between men and women sounds dramatic, Stone says, advisors should be aware that the gap is actually much smaller for their retirement-age clients.

This is the case because the gender-based life expectancy gap between men and women is far higher at birth, as young men are far more likely to die in accidents and have higher rates of mortality from tobacco and alcohol use. The key planning implication is that men who survive to age 65 actually have a life expectancy that is only about two years shorter than 65-year-old women.

As Stone points out, financing a comfortable retirement involves many factors that must be taken into account. One of the most important, which is often misunderstood, is longevity — that is, how long one might actually live.

Longevity is different from life expectancy, Stone emphasizes, which is how long an individual of a given age, gender and health status would be likely to live on average.

Put another way, there is a significant chance that any given individual will live for many years beyond the average, and advisors should consider this possibility when thinking about retirement clients.

According to Stone, it's time for advisors and the broader financial planning community to improve their understanding of longevity.

A Useful Tool

To this end, Stone encourages advisors to check out a recently developed tool offered to the public on the Academy of Actuaries website, dubbed the Actuaries Longevity Illustrator (ALI).

Stone describes the illustrator as an eye-opening tool to play around with for a greater understanding of planning considerations in light of longevity — as opposed to just life expectancy. It includes the option to print out a report to be shared among advisors and clients, which is helpful.

To use the tool, users input basic data points about their health, smoking habits and demographic characteristics. The tool, in turn, generates detailed tables and graphs showing the likelihood that a given individual (and their spouse or partner, if applicable) may live to a certain age.

In addition, the tool provides information on the number of future years that one might expect to live, as opposed to living to certain ages. Stone says the tables and graphs can be used to help clients understand their potential longevity risk.

Reflecting on this possibility will allow clients to consider their individualized risk of outliving their financial resources, Stone explains. The tool is particularly useful when a retirement plan involves two people, as the longevity considerations become even more complex.

(Pictured: Linda Stone, senior pension fellow at the Academy of Actuaries)

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Related Stories

Resource Center